对于说土耳其语的患者，哪种手部结果测量方法是最佳的？
Which hand outcome measurement is best for Turkish speaking patients?
作者信息
Oksüz Ciğdem, Akel Burcu Semin, Leblebicioğlu Gürsel, Kayıhan Hülya
机构信息
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
出版信息
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(2):83-8. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2012.2580.
OBJECTIVE
In determining treatment outcomes of the hand, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Milliken Activities of Daily Living Scale (MAS) questionnaires are the most commonly used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relations, strengths and weaknesses of these questionnaires and determine the most appropriate outcome measure for the Turkish population.
METHODS
The study included 74 patients with various types of hand injuries. Patients filled out the DASH-Turkish, MHQ and MAS questionnaires. Grip strength and pain intensity were also assessed.
RESULTS
MAS parameters were well-correlated with DASH-Turkish and grip strength (p<0.05). MHQ was correlated with all other outcomes except the left hand part.
CONCLUSION
The DASH, MHQ and MAS questionnaires are culturally compatible with the Turkish population and have revealed a good correlation. These results suggest that these outcome instruments can be used in the assessment of hand and wrist surgery outcomes in the Turkish population.
目的
在确定手部治疗结果时，上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍（DASH）问卷、密歇根手部结果问卷（MHQ）和米利肯日常生活活动量表（MAS）是最常用的。本研究的目的是评估这些问卷的关系、优缺点，并确定针对土耳其人群最合适的结果测量方法。
方法
该研究纳入了74例患有各种类型手部损伤的患者。患者填写了土耳其语版DASH问卷、MHQ问卷和MAS问卷。还评估了握力和疼痛强度。
结果
MAS参数与土耳其语版DASH问卷和握力具有良好的相关性（p<0.05）。MHQ与除左手部分之外的所有其他结果相关。
结论
DASH问卷、MHQ问卷和MAS问卷在文化上与土耳其人群相适应，并且显示出良好的相关性。这些结果表明，这些结果评估工具可用于评估土耳其人群的手部和腕部手术结果。
Zotero 插件