• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被遗忘的创伤患者:经急救医疗服务评估但未送往医院的受伤患者的结局。

The forgotten trauma patient: outcomes for injured patients evaluated by emergency medical services but not transported to the hospital.

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5641, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):594-9; discussion 599-600. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824764ef.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31824764ef
PMID:22491541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3489913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injured patients who are not transported by an ambulance to the hospital are often not included in trauma registries. The outcomes of these patients have until now been unknown. Understanding what happens to nontransports is necessary to better understand triage validity, patient outcomes, and costs associated with injury. We hypothesized that a subset of patients who were not transported from the scene would later present for evaluation and that these patients would have a nonzero mortality rate.

METHODS

This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of injured adults and children for three counties in California from 2006 to 2008. Prehospital data for injured patients for whom an ambulance was dispatched were probabilistically linked to trauma registry data from four trauma centers, state-level discharge data, emergency department records, and death files (1-year mortality).

RESULTS

A total of 69,413 injured persons who were evaluated at the scene by emergency medical services were included in the analysis. Of them, 5,865 (8.5%) were not transported. Of those not transported, 1,616 (28%) were later seen in an emergency department and discharged and 92 (2%) were admitted. Seven (0.2%) patients later died.

CONCLUSION

Patients evaluated by emergency medical services, but not initially transported from the field after injury, often present later to the hospital. The mortality rate in this population was not zero, and these patients may represent preventable deaths.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

未通过救护车送往医院的受伤患者通常不会被纳入创伤登记处。这些患者的结局在此之前一直不为人知。了解未转运患者的情况对于更好地理解分诊的有效性、患者结局以及与损伤相关的成本是必要的。我们假设,一部分未从现场转运的患者会在之后到医院接受评估,且这些患者的死亡率不会为零。

方法

这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为加利福尼亚州三个县的成年和儿童受伤患者,研究时间为 2006 年至 2008 年。对派出救护车的受伤患者的院前数据进行了概率性链接,以获取来自四个创伤中心、州级出院数据、急诊记录和死亡档案(1 年死亡率)的创伤登记处数据。

结果

共有 69413 名在现场接受急救服务评估的受伤人员纳入分析。其中 5865 人(8.5%)未被转运。在未被转运的患者中,有 1616 人(28%)后来在急诊室就诊并出院,92 人(2%)被收治入院。有 7 人(0.2%)后来死亡。

结论

由急救医疗服务机构评估但受伤后未立即从现场转运的患者通常会在之后到医院就诊。该人群的死亡率并非为零,这些患者可能代表可预防的死亡。

证据水平

III 级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
The forgotten trauma patient: outcomes for injured patients evaluated by emergency medical services but not transported to the hospital.被遗忘的创伤患者:经急救医疗服务评估但未送往医院的受伤患者的结局。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):594-9; discussion 599-600. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824764ef.
2
Comparison of Injured Older Adults Included in vs Excluded From Trauma Registries With 1-Year Follow-up.比较纳入与排除于创伤登记研究中、具有 1 年随访的老年受伤患者。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):e192279. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2279. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Pediatric trauma patients are more likely to be discharged from the emergency department after arrival by helicopter emergency medical services.儿科创伤患者在通过直升机紧急医疗服务到达后更有可能从急诊部门出院。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):917-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e19a4.
4
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
5
Evaluation of Rural vs Urban Trauma Patients Served by 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Services.对由911紧急医疗服务系统服务的农村与城市创伤患者的评估。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jan 1;152(1):11-18. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3329.
6
Trauma system resource preservation: A simple scene triage tool can reduce helicopter emergency medical services overutilization in a state trauma system.创伤系统资源保护:一种简单的现场分诊工具可减少州创伤系统中直升机紧急医疗服务的过度使用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Aug;87(2):315-321. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002309.
7
Patient choice in the selection of hospitals by 9-1-1 emergency medical services providers in trauma systems.创伤体系中 9-1-1 紧急医疗服务提供者选择医院时患者的选择。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):911-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12213.
8
An analysis of overtriage and undertriage by advanced life support transport in a mature trauma system.成熟创伤体系中高级生命支持转运的过筛和漏筛分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 May;88(5):704-709. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002602.
9
Association between prehospital time and outcome of trauma patients in 4 Asian countries: A cross-national, multicenter cohort study.4 个亚洲国家创伤患者院前时间与结局的关联:一项跨国、多中心队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003360. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Triage of elderly trauma patients: a population-based perspective.老年创伤患者的分诊:基于人群的视角。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.06.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance crew-initiated non-conveyance in the Helsinki EMS system-A retrospective cohort study.救护车机组人员发起的不转运在赫尔辛基紧急医疗服务系统中的回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 May;66(5):625-633. doi: 10.1111/aas.14049. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.从患者安全和专业角度看待救护车转运中的非转运问题:系统综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jul 17;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6.
3
Evaluation of preventable trauma death in emergency department of Imam Reza hospital.伊玛目礼萨医院急诊科可预防创伤死亡情况评估
World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(2):135-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.02.009.
4
Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: a population-based study.老年人与年轻人在机动车碰撞后的救护车转运率:一项基于人群的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the use of existing data sources, probabilistic linkage, and multiple imputation to build population-based injury databases across phases of trauma care.评估利用现有数据源、概率性链接和多重插补在创伤救治各阶段构建基于人群的伤害数据库。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):469-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01324.x.
2
Developing a statewide emergency medical services database linked to hospital outcomes: a feasibility study.建立全州范围的紧急医疗服务数据库并与医院结果关联:一项可行性研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):303-19. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561404.
3
Validation of probabilistic linkage to match de-identified ambulance records to a state trauma registry.将去识别化的救护车记录与州创伤登记处进行匹配的概率性关联验证。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):69-75. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.029. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
4
Outcomes of patients not transported after calling 911.拨打911后未被转运患者的结局。
J Emerg Med. 2005 May;28(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.11.025.
5
Practical introduction to record linkage for injury research.伤害研究中记录链接的实践介绍。
Inj Prev. 2004 Jun;10(3):186-91. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004580.
6
Against all advice: an analysis of out-of-hospital refusals of care.违背所有建议:院外拒绝治疗情况分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;42(5):689-96. doi: 10.1016/S0196064403005249.
7
Hospital follow-up of patients categorized as not needing an ambulance using a set of emergency medical technician protocols.使用一套急救医疗技术人员协议对被归类为不需要救护车的患者进行医院随访。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Oct-Dec;5(4):366-70. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939526.
8
Probabilistic linkage of computerized ambulance and inpatient hospital discharge records: a potential tool for evaluation of emergency medical services.计算机化救护车与住院患者出院记录的概率关联:一种评估紧急医疗服务的潜在工具。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):616-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115214.
9
Evaluation of protocols allowing emergency medical technicians to determine need for treatment and transport.对允许急救医疗技术人员确定治疗和转运需求的方案进行评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):663-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02041.x.
10
Do patients refusing transport remember descriptions of risks after initial advanced life support assessment?
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;5(8):796-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02506.x.