Kyratsis Yiannis, Ahmad Raheelah, Holmes Alison
Department of Infectious Diseases, National Centre for Infection Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2012 Apr 4;2(2):e000872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872. Print 2012.
To understand organisational technology adoption (initiation, adoption decision, implementation) by looking at the different types of innovation knowledge used during this process.
Qualitative, multisite, comparative case study design.
One primary care and 11 acute care organisations (trusts) across all health regions in England in the context of infection prevention and control. PARTICIPANTS AND DATA ANALYSIS: 121 semistructured individual and group interviews with 109 informants, involving clinical and non-clinical staff from all organisational levels and various professional groups. Documentary evidence and field notes were also used. 38 technology adoption processes were analysed using an integrated approach combining inductive and deductive reasoning.
Those involved in the process variably accessed three types of innovation knowledge: 'awareness' (information that an innovation exists), 'principles' (information about an innovation's functioning principles) and 'how-to' (information required to use an innovation properly at individual and organisational levels). Centralised (national, government-led) and local sources were used to obtain this knowledge. Localised professional networks were preferred sources for all three types of knowledge. Professional backgrounds influenced an asymmetric attention to different types of innovation knowledge. When less attention was given to 'how-to' compared with 'principles' knowledge at the early stages of the process, this contributed to 12 cases of incomplete implementation or discontinuance after initial adoption.
Potential adopters and change agents often overlooked or undervalued 'how-to' knowledge. Balancing 'principles' and 'how-to' knowledge early in the innovation process enhanced successful technology adoption and implementation by considering efficacy as well as strategic, structural and cultural fit with the organisation's context. This learning is critical given the policy emphasis for health organisations to be innovation-ready.
通过审视在此过程中使用的不同类型的创新知识,来了解组织技术采用(启动、采用决策、实施)情况。
定性、多地点、比较案例研究设计。
在英格兰所有卫生区域的1家初级保健机构和11家急症护理机构(信托机构)中开展感染预防与控制方面的研究。参与者与数据分析:对109名受访者进行了121次半结构化的个人及小组访谈,涉及所有组织层面和不同专业群体的临床及非临床工作人员。还使用了文献证据和实地记录。采用归纳推理与演绎推理相结合的综合方法,对38个技术采用过程进行了分析。
参与该过程的人员以不同方式获取了三种类型的创新知识:“知晓”(关于某项创新存在的信息)、“原理”(关于某项创新运作原理的信息)和“操作方法”(在个人和组织层面正确使用某项创新所需的信息)。通过集中(国家、政府主导)和地方来源获取这些知识。本地化的专业网络是获取所有这三种知识的首选来源。专业背景影响了对不同类型创新知识的不对称关注。在该过程的早期阶段,与“原理”知识相比,对“操作方法”知识的关注较少,这导致了12例在初步采用后实施不完整或中断的情况。
潜在采用者和变革推动者常常忽视或低估“操作方法”知识。在创新过程的早期平衡“原理”和“操作方法”知识,通过考虑功效以及与组织背景的战略、结构和文化契合度,可提高技术采用和实施的成功率。鉴于政策强调卫生组织要做好创新准备,这一经验教训至关重要。