Panthera, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035209. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
In species in which juvenile survival depends strongly on male tenure, excessive trophy hunting can artificially elevate male turnover and increase infanticide, potentially to unsustainable levels. Simulation models show that the likelihood of safe harvests can be improved by restricting offtakes to males old enough to have reared their first cohort of offspring to independence; in the case of African leopards, males were ≥7 years old. Here, we explore the applicability of an age-based approach for regulating trophy hunting of leopards. We conducted a structured survey comprising photographs of known-age leopards to assess the ability of wildlife practitioners to sex and age leopards. We also evaluated the utility of four phenotypic traits for use by trophy hunters to age male leopards in the field. Our logistic regression models showed that male leopard age affected the likelihood of survey respondents identifying the correct sex; notably, males <2 years were typically misidentified as females, while mature males (≥4 years) were sexed correctly. Mature male leopards were also more likely to be aged correctly, as were portrait photographs. Aging proficiency was also influenced by the profession of respondents, with hunters recording the lowest scores. A discriminant model including dewlap size, the condition of the ears, and the extent of facial scarring accurately discriminated among male leopard age classes. Model classification rates were considerably higher than the respective scores attained by survey respondents, implying that the aging ability of hunters could theoretically improve with appropriate training. Dewlap size was a particularly reliable indicator of males ≥7 years and a review of online trophy galleries suggested its wider utility as an aging criterion. Our study demonstrated that an age-based hunting approach is practically applicable for leopards. However, implementation would require major reform within the regulatory framework and the hunting industry.
在那些幼体存活率强烈依赖雄性持续时间的物种中,过度的奖杯狩猎可能会人为地增加雄性更替率,并增加杀婴行为,可能达到不可持续的水平。模拟模型表明,可以通过限制对已经养育了第一窝幼崽的雄性的收获来提高安全收获的可能性;在非洲豹的情况下,雄性年龄≥7 岁。在这里,我们探讨了一种基于年龄的方法来管理豹子的奖杯狩猎的适用性。我们进行了一项包括已知年龄豹子照片的结构化调查,以评估野生动物从业者识别豹子性别和年龄的能力。我们还评估了四种表型特征在野外用于雄性豹子年龄鉴定的实用性。我们的逻辑回归模型表明,雄性豹子的年龄会影响调查受访者确定正确性别的可能性;值得注意的是,年龄<2 岁的雄性通常被错误地鉴定为雌性,而成熟的雄性(≥4 岁)则被正确地鉴定为雄性。成熟的雄性豹子也更有可能被正确地鉴定年龄,肖像照片也是如此。年龄鉴定能力还受到受访者职业的影响,猎人的得分最低。一个包括垂肉大小、耳朵状况和面部疤痕程度的判别模型能够准确地区分雄性豹的年龄类别。模型分类率明显高于调查受访者的各自得分,这意味着猎人的年龄鉴定能力理论上可以通过适当的培训得到提高。垂肉大小是≥7 岁雄性的一个特别可靠的指标,对在线奖杯画廊的审查表明,它作为一个年龄鉴定标准具有更广泛的实用性。我们的研究表明,基于年龄的狩猎方法在实践上适用于豹子。然而,实施这一方法需要在监管框架和狩猎行业内进行重大改革。