• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马普托兰保护区内豹种群数量稀少:偷猎、栖息地状况、猎物丰富度及顶级捕食者的影响

Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator.

作者信息

Ramesh Tharmalingam, Kalle Riddhika, Rosenlund Havard, Downs Colleen T

机构信息

School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Scottsville Pietermaritzburg KwaZulu-Natal South Africa.

School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Scottsville Pietermaritzburg KwaZulu-Natal South Africa; School of Ecology and Environment Studies Nalanda University Rajgir India.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 23;7(6):1964-1973. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2771. eCollection 2017 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.2771
PMID:28331603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5355197/
Abstract

Identifying the primary causes affecting population densities and distribution of flagship species are necessary in developing sustainable management strategies for large carnivore conservation. We modeled drivers of spatial density of the common leopard () using a spatially explicit capture-recapture-Bayesian approach to understand their population dynamics in the Maputaland Conservation Unit, South Africa. We camera-trapped leopards in four protected areas (PAs) of varying sizes and disturbance levels covering 198 camera stations. Ours is the first study to explore the effects of poaching level, abundance of prey species (small, medium, and large), competitors (lion and spotted hyenas ), and habitat on the spatial distribution of common leopard density. Twenty-six male and 41 female leopards were individually identified and estimated leopard density ranged from 1.6 ± 0.62/100 km (smallest PA-Ndumo) to 8.4 ± 1.03/100 km (largest PA-western shores). Although dry forest thickets and plantation habitats largely represented the western shores, the plantation areas had extremely low leopard density compared to native forest. We found that leopard density increased in areas when low poaching levels/no poaching was recorded in dry forest thickets and with high abundance of medium-sized prey, but decreased with increasing abundance of lion. Because local leopard populations are vulnerable to extinction, particularly in smaller PAs, the long-term sustainability of leopard populations depend on developing appropriate management strategies that consider a combination of multiple factors to maintain their optimal habitats.

摘要

确定影响旗舰物种种群密度和分布的主要原因,对于制定大型食肉动物保护的可持续管理策略至关重要。我们使用空间明确的捕获-重捕-贝叶斯方法,对普通豹()的空间密度驱动因素进行建模,以了解它们在南非马普托兰保护单元的种群动态。我们在四个大小和干扰程度不同的保护区设置了相机陷阱,覆盖198个相机站点来监测豹的活动。我们的研究首次探讨了偷猎水平、猎物种类(小型、中型和大型)数量、竞争者(狮子和斑鬣狗)以及栖息地对普通豹密度空间分布的影响。共识别出26只雄性豹和41只雌性豹,估计豹的密度范围从每100平方公里1.6±0.62只(最小的保护区-恩杜莫)到每100平方公里8.4±1.03只(最大的保护区-西海岸)。尽管干燥森林灌木丛和种植园栖息地在很大程度上构成了西海岸,但与原生森林相比,种植园地区的豹密度极低。我们发现,在干燥森林灌木丛中偷猎水平低/无偷猎且中型猎物数量丰富的地区,豹的密度会增加,但随着狮子数量的增加而减少。由于当地豹种群极易灭绝,尤其是在较小的保护区,豹种群的长期可持续性取决于制定适当的管理策略,综合考虑多种因素以维持其最佳栖息地。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/a31cfa367b55/ECE3-7-1964-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/2620870c2ad6/ECE3-7-1964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/dc7847686b53/ECE3-7-1964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/65808c36a581/ECE3-7-1964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/a31cfa367b55/ECE3-7-1964-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/2620870c2ad6/ECE3-7-1964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/dc7847686b53/ECE3-7-1964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/65808c36a581/ECE3-7-1964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f43/5355197/a31cfa367b55/ECE3-7-1964-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator.马普托兰保护区内豹种群数量稀少:偷猎、栖息地状况、猎物丰富度及顶级捕食者的影响
Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 23;7(6):1964-1973. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2771. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部姆布罗国家公园的豹和斑点鬣狗密度。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 27;10:e12307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12307. eCollection 2022.
3
Lions and leopards coexist without spatial, temporal or demographic effects of interspecific competition.狮子和豹子共存,没有种间竞争的空间、时间或种群动态效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1709-1726. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12883. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
Leopard density and the ecological and anthropogenic factors influencing density in a mixed-use landscape in the Western Cape, South Africa.南非西开普省混合使用景观中影响豹子密度的生态和人为因素及豹子密度
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 27;18(10):e0293445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293445. eCollection 2023.
5
Reducing persecution is more effective for restoring large carnivores than restoring their prey.减少迫害对于大型食肉动物的恢复比恢复其猎物更有效。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02338. doi: 10.1002/eap.2338. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.储备种群大小和人为干扰会影响非洲豹(Panthera pardus)复合种群的密度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0209541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209541. eCollection 2019.
7
Spatial variation in leopard (Panthera pardus) site use across a gradient of anthropogenic pressure in Tanzania's Ruaha landscape.坦桑尼亚鲁阿哈景观中豹(Panthera pardus)栖息地利用的空间变化与人为压力梯度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204370. eCollection 2018.
8
Elusive cats in our backyards: persistence of the North Chinese leopard (Panthera pardus japonensis) in a human-dominated landscape in central China.我国后院的 elusive cats:在中国中部人类主导景观中北中国豹( Panthera pardus japonensis )的持续存在。
Integr Zool. 2021 Jan;16(1):67-83. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12482. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
9
Troubled spots: Human impacts constrain the density of an apex predator inside protected areas.问题区域:人类活动制约了保护区内顶级捕食者的密度。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jun;32(4):e2551. doi: 10.1002/eap.2551. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Density estimation of tiger and leopard using spatially explicit capture-recapture framework.使用空间明确的捕获-再捕获框架对老虎和豹子进行密度估计。
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 17;9:e10634. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10634. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Leopard density and determinants of space use in a farming landscape in South Africa.南非农耕景观中豹密度及其空间利用决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 8;14(1):10562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61013-6.
2
Leopard density and the ecological and anthropogenic factors influencing density in a mixed-use landscape in the Western Cape, South Africa.南非西开普省混合使用景观中影响豹子密度的生态和人为因素及豹子密度
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 27;18(10):e0293445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293445. eCollection 2023.
3
Population size, density, and ranging behaviour in a key leopard population in the Western Cape, South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Face Value: Towards Robust Estimates of Snow Leopard Densities.表面价值:迈向雪豹密度的稳健估计
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(9):e0134815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134815. eCollection 2015.
2
An objective approach to determining the weight ranges of prey preferred by and accessible to the five large African carnivores.一种确定五种大型非洲食肉动物偏好且可获取的猎物重量范围的客观方法。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 2;9(7):e101054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101054. eCollection 2014.
3
Evidence of a high density population of harvested leopards in a montane environment.
南非西开普省一个关键豹种群的种群规模、密度和活动范围。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0254507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254507. eCollection 2022.
4
Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica.西北哥斯达黎加人类采集和动物捕食海龟巢的动态。
PeerJ. 2022 Apr 26;10:e12925. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12925. eCollection 2022.
5
Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部姆布罗国家公园的豹和斑点鬣狗密度。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 27;10:e12307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12307. eCollection 2022.
6
Prey availability and intraguild competition regulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of a modified large carnivore guild.猎物可获得性和种内竞争调节了一个经过改良的大型食肉动物群落的时空动态。
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 16;11(12):7890-7904. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7620. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Assumptions about fence permeability influence density estimates for brown hyaenas across South Africa.关于围栏渗透性的假设会影响南非各地的棕色鬣狗密度估计。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77188-7.
8
Spatio-temporal partitioning and coexistence between leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) and Asiatic lion (Panthera leo persica) in Gir protected area, Gujarat, India.印度古吉拉特邦吉尔自然保护区豹(Panthera pardus fusca)和亚洲狮(Panthera leo persica)的时空分区与共存。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229045. eCollection 2020.
9
Spatial variation in leopard (Panthera pardus) site use across a gradient of anthropogenic pressure in Tanzania's Ruaha landscape.坦桑尼亚鲁阿哈景观中豹(Panthera pardus)栖息地利用的空间变化与人为压力梯度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204370. eCollection 2018.
高山环境中存在高密度的猎捕豹种群的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 9;8(12):e82832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082832. eCollection 2013.
4
How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?空间研究设计如何影响空间捕获-再捕获模型的密度估计?
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034575. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
5
Applicability of age-based hunting regulations for African leopards.基于年龄的狩猎法规对非洲豹的适用性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035209. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models.贝叶斯推断在一类空间捕获-再捕获模型的相机陷阱研究中的应用。
Ecology. 2009 Nov;90(11):3233-44. doi: 10.1890/08-1481.1.
7
A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data.用于空间捕获-再捕获数据的分层模型。
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2281-9. doi: 10.1890/07-0601.1.
8
Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora.食肉动物的饮食、形态及种间杀戮
Am Nat. 2006 Apr;167(4):524-36. doi: 10.1086/501033. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
9
Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance.老虎及其猎物:根据猎物丰度预测食肉动物密度
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):4854-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306210101. Epub 2004 Mar 23.
10
Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas.边缘效应与保护区内种群的灭绝
Science. 1998 Jun 26;280(5372):2126-8. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2126.