Suppr超能文献

理解针对不同人群的措施修改的框架。

A framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations.

机构信息

Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2012 Sep;24(6):992-1017. doi: 10.1177/0898264312440321. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research on health disparities and determinants of health disparities among ethnic minorities and vulnerable older populations necessitates use of self-report measures. Most established instruments were developed on mainstream populations and may need adaptation for research with diverse populations. Although information is increasingly available on various problems using these measures in diverse groups, there is little guidance on how to modify the measures. A framework of issues to consider when modifying measures for diverse populations is presented.

METHODS

The authors describe reasons for considering modifications, the types of information that can be used as a basis for making modifications, and the types of modifications researchers have made. Recommendations are made to test modified measures to assure their appropriateness, and suggestions are provided on reporting modifications in publications using the measures.

DISCUSSION

The issues open a dialogue about what appropriate guidelines would be for researchers adapting measures in studies of ethnically diverse populations.

摘要

目的

研究少数民族和弱势老年人口的健康差距及其决定因素,需要使用自我报告的测量方法。大多数已建立的工具都是针对主流人群开发的,因此可能需要对不同人群的研究进行调整。尽管越来越多的信息可以使用这些措施来解决各种问题,但关于如何修改这些措施的指导很少。本文提出了一个在不同人群中修改测量方法时需要考虑的问题框架。

方法

作者描述了考虑修改的原因、可以作为修改基础的信息类型,以及研究人员进行的修改类型。建议对修改后的测量方法进行测试,以确保其适用性,并就使用这些测量方法的出版物中报告修改内容提供建议。

讨论

这些问题为研究人员在研究种族多样化人群时,如何制定适当的指导方针提供了一个对话的机会。

相似文献

1
A framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations.
J Aging Health. 2012 Sep;24(6):992-1017. doi: 10.1177/0898264312440321. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
2
Theory-guided selection of discrimination measures for racial/ ethnic health disparities research among older adults.
J Aging Health. 2012 Sep;24(6):1018-43. doi: 10.1177/0898264312440322. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
3
Advancing health disparities research: can we afford to ignore measurement issues?
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1207-20. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093420.27745.48.
5
Applying a Conceptual Framework to Maximize the Participation of Diverse Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Adv Cancer Res. 2017;133:77-94. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
6
7
Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103(12):2141-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301200. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
9
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding our thought horizons in systems biology and medicine.
Front Syst Biol. 2024 Mar 6;4:1385458. doi: 10.3389/fsysb.2024.1385458. eCollection 2024.
2
A scoping review of clinical communication in cancer care in Africa.
Oncologist. 2025 Apr 4;30(4). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf039.
3
Adapting a Functional Assessment of Cigarette Smoking for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Jul 22;18(1):137-149. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00958-6. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation: South African Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025 Jan 13;67(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.5826.
9
Construct validation and measurement invariance of the Parasocial Relationships in Social Media survey.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300356. eCollection 2024.
10
Toward the conceptualization and measurement of transphobia-driven intimate partner violence.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;341:116532. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116532. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Coping resources and self-rated health among Latina breast cancer survivors.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Sep;38(5):523-31. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.523-531.
4
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish Brief Religious Coping Scale (S-BRCS).
J Transcult Nurs. 2011 Jul;22(3):248-56. doi: 10.1177/1043659611404426. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
5
The measurement of spirituality in palliative care and the content of tools validated cross-culturally: a systematic review.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Apr;41(4):728-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.023.
6
The patient-reported Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey: a field test among older Latino primary care patients.
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):63-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00654.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Applying cognitive debriefing to pre-test patient-reported outcomes in older people with multiple sclerosis.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9602-z. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
10
Validated questionnaires should not be modified.
Eur Respir J. 2009 Nov;34(5):1015-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00110209.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验