Goyal Ankur, Sharma Raju, Bhalla Ashu S, Gamanagatti Shivanand, Seth Amlesh, Iyer Venkateswaran K, Das Prasenjit
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):349-58. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110415.
Though previous investigators have attempted to evaluate its utility in characterization of focal renal lesions, diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW MRI) in renal diseases is still an evolving field and its role in predicting the aggressiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is yet to be established.
To assess whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values can be used to determine the nuclear grade and histological subtype of RCCs and to identify the tumor attributes contributing to variation in ADC values.
The institutional ethics committee waived the requirement of informed consent for this retrospective study. The study cohort consisted of 33 patients who underwent MRI (with diffusion-weighted imaging at b values of 0 and 500 s/mm(2)) and were found to have 36 pathologically-proven RCCs. ADC values were determined for solid portions of RCC, cystic/hemorrhagic areas, and normal renal parenchyma. Histological subtype, nuclear grade, and cell count were determined for each lesion. ADC values were compared between different grades and subtypes and correlation with cell count was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to establish cut-off ADC values.
There were 23 low grade (grades I and II) and 13 high grade tumors (grades III and IV). There were 32 clear-cell and four non-clear-cell RCCs. A decreasing trend of ADC values was seen with increasing grade and mean ADC of high grade RCC was significantly lower than low grade (1.3145 vs 1.6982 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P = 0.005). Mean ADC for clear-cell RCC was significantly higher than non-clear-cell RCC (1.6245 vs. 1.0412 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P = 0.005). ADC values higher than 1.7960 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s were seen only with low grade and values greater than 1.4904 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s were seen only with clear-cell RCC.
ADC values provide a non-invasive means to predict the nuclear grade and histological subtype of RCC. Cellularity and morphology are other tumor attributes contributing to the variation in ADC values of RCCs.
尽管先前的研究人员试图评估扩散加权磁共振成像(DW MRI)在局灶性肾病变特征描述中的效用,但肾脏疾病中的DW MRI仍处于不断发展的阶段,其在预测肾细胞癌(RCC)侵袭性方面的作用尚未确立。
评估表观扩散系数(ADC)值是否可用于确定RCC的核分级和组织学亚型,并确定导致ADC值变化的肿瘤特征。
本回顾性研究经机构伦理委员会批准,无需患者知情同意。研究队列包括33例接受MRI检查(b值为0和500 s/mm²时进行扩散加权成像)且经病理证实患有36个RCC的患者。测定RCC实性部分、囊性/出血区域及正常肾实质的ADC值。确定每个病变的组织学亚型、核分级和细胞计数。比较不同分级和亚型之间的ADC值,并研究其与细胞计数的相关性。绘制受试者操作特征曲线以确定ADC值的临界值。
有23个低级别(I级和II级)肿瘤和13个高级别(III级和IV级)肿瘤。有32个透明细胞RCC和4个非透明细胞RCC。随着分级增加,ADC值呈下降趋势,高级别RCC的平均ADC值显著低于低级别(1.3145对1.6982×10⁻³ mm²/s)(P = 0.005)。透明细胞RCC的平均ADC值显著高于非透明细胞RCC(1.6245对1.0412×10⁻³ mm²/s)(P = 0.005)。仅低级别肿瘤的ADC值高于1.7960×10⁻³ mm²/s,仅透明细胞RCC的ADC值大于1.4904×10⁻³ mm²/s。
ADC值提供了一种非侵入性方法来预测RCC的核分级和组织学亚型。细胞密度和形态是导致RCC的ADC值变化的其他肿瘤特征。