• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以社区为基础的信仰干预随机试验,以减少阿巴拉契亚地区的宫颈癌负担。

A community-based randomized trial of a faith-placed intervention to reduce cervical cancer burden in Appalachia.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2012 Jun;54(6):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.019
PMID:22498022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3368037/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Faith Moves Mountains assessed the effectiveness of a faith-placed lay health advisor (LHA) intervention to increase Papanicolaou (Pap) test use among middle-aged and older women in a region disproportionately affected by cervical cancer and low screening rates (regionally, only 68% screened in prior 3 years).

METHOD

This community-based RCT was conducted in four Appalachian Kentucky counties (December 2005-June 2008). Women aged 40-64 and overdue for screening were recruited from churches and individually randomized to treatment (n=176) or wait-list control (n=169). The intervention provided LHA home visits and newsletters addressing barriers to screening. Self-reported Pap test receipt was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that treatment group participants (17.6% screened) had over twice the odds of wait-list controls (11.2% screened) of reporting Pap test receipt post-intervention, OR=2.56, 95% CI: 1.03-6.38, p=0.04. Independent of group, recently screened participants (last Pap >1 but <5 years ago) had significantly higher odds of obtaining screening during the study than rarely or never screened participants (last Pap ≥5 years ago), OR=2.50, 95% CI: 1.48-4.25, p=0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention was associated with increased cervical cancer screening. The faith-placed LHA addressing barriers comprises a novel approach to reducing cervical cancer disparities among Appalachian women.

摘要

目的

“信仰移山”评估了信仰引导员(LHA)干预对增加中年和老年女性巴氏涂片(Pap)检测使用的效果,这些女性所在的地区受宫颈癌和低筛查率的影响不成比例(在该地区,只有 68%的女性在过去 3 年内接受过筛查)。

方法

这是一项基于社区的 RCT,在肯塔基州的四个阿巴拉契亚县进行(2005 年 12 月至 2008 年 6 月)。从教堂招募年龄在 40-64 岁且筛查过期的女性,并对其进行个体随机分组,分别接受治疗(n=176)或候补名单对照(n=169)。干预措施提供了 LHA 家访和解决筛查障碍的通讯。自我报告的 Pap 检测结果是主要结局。

结果

意向治疗分析显示,治疗组参与者(17.6%接受筛查)在报告 Pap 检测结果方面的可能性是候补名单对照组(11.2%接受筛查)的两倍以上,OR=2.56,95%CI:1.03-6.38,p=0.04。无论分组如何,最近接受筛查的参与者(上次 Pap 检查>1 年但<5 年前)在研究期间获得筛查的可能性明显高于很少或从未接受过筛查的参与者(上次 Pap 检查≥5 年前),OR=2.50,95%CI:1.48-4.25,p=0.001。

结论

该干预措施与增加宫颈癌筛查相关。针对障碍的信仰引导员干预构成了减少阿巴拉契亚妇女宫颈癌差异的一种新方法。

相似文献

1
A community-based randomized trial of a faith-placed intervention to reduce cervical cancer burden in Appalachia.以社区为基础的信仰干预随机试验,以减少阿巴拉契亚地区的宫颈癌负担。
Prev Med. 2012 Jun;54(6):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
2
Evaluating the efficacy of lay health advisors for increasing risk-appropriate Pap test screening: a randomized controlled trial among Ohio Appalachian women.评估初级卫生保健顾问在提高风险适当的巴氏涂片筛查中的效果:俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚妇女中的一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 May;20(5):835-43. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0880. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
3
Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.HPV 自我采样后未定期筛查女性的宫颈癌筛查预测因素:我的身体我的检测-1。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Aug;28(8):1094-1104. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7141. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
4
Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.评估改变阶段模型在俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚女性宫颈癌筛查干预中的应用。
Women Health. 2016;56(4):468-86. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1101736. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Community-Based Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Feasibility Study of Rural Appalachian Women.基于社区的宫颈癌筛查:阿巴拉契亚农村女性的可行性研究
Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Nov;42(11):607-11. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000365.
6
Community health worker intervention to decrease cervical cancer disparities in Hispanic women.社区卫生工作者干预以减少西班牙裔妇女宫颈癌的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1186-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1434-6. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
7
A Community-Academic Partnership to Increase Pap Testing in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区旨在增加子宫颈抹片检查的社区-学术合作关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.028.
8
Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: an exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia.自行采集宫颈阴道标本进行宫颈癌筛查:农村阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足的妇女中可接受性的探索性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132 Suppl 1(0 1):S21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Perspectives from health-care providers and women about completing human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing at home.医疗服务提供者和女性对于在家中完成人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我检测的看法。
Women Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;57(10):1161-1177. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2016.1243608. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
10
Faith Moves Mountains: an Appalachian cervical cancer prevention program.信念移山:阿巴拉契亚宫颈癌预防项目
Am J Health Behav. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):627-38. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.33.6.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women.确定阿巴拉契亚农村地区女性肺部健康不良后果的风险因素。
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e70035. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70035.
2
Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.与基于信仰的组织开展的癌症干预措施:一项范围综述
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6.
3
Reflecting on partnerships established and sustained over four cycles of a federally funded cancer prevention and control research program: lessons learned for community-academic networks.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of lay health advisors for increasing risk-appropriate Pap test screening: a randomized controlled trial among Ohio Appalachian women.评估初级卫生保健顾问在提高风险适当的巴氏涂片筛查中的效果:俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚妇女中的一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 May;20(5):835-43. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0880. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
2
Predictors of cervical cancer screening for rarely or never screened rural Appalachian women.很少或从未接受过宫颈癌筛查的阿巴拉契亚农村女性的宫颈癌筛查预测因素。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Feb;22(1):176-93. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0021.
3
Faith Moves Mountains: an Appalachian cervical cancer prevention program.
回顾在一个由联邦资助的癌症预防与控制研究项目的四个周期中建立并维持的伙伴关系:社区-学术网络的经验教训
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1384588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1384588. eCollection 2024.
4
The barriers and enablers to accessing sexual health and sexual well-being services for midlife women (aged 40-65 years) in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review.高收入国家中年女性(40-65 岁)获取性健康和性福祉服务的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241277723. doi: 10.1177/17455057241277723.
5
A Christian Faith-Based Facebook Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Rural Communities (FAITH-CORE): Protocol for a Community Participatory Development Study.一项基于基督教信仰的农村社区戒烟Facebook干预措施(FAITH-CORE):一项社区参与式发展研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Dec 13;12:e52398. doi: 10.2196/52398.
6
Assessing Social Needs and Engaging Community Health Workers in Underserved Kansas Counties: Insights From Primary Care Providers and Clinic Managers.评估社会需求并让社区卫生工作者参与服务不足的堪萨斯州县:来自初级保健提供者和诊所管理人员的见解。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231214513. doi: 10.1177/21501319231214513.
7
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Health Education Programs for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Communities: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.农村社区宫颈癌预防健康教育项目有效性的系统评价:促进健康公平的意义。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):126-138. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
8
Impact of a Cancer Education Curriculum on Appalachian Kentucky Middle and High School Students.癌症教育课程对阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州中学生的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Dec;38(6):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02354-0. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
9
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.社会决定因素与美国癌症筛查干预措施:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct;73(5):461-479. doi: 10.3322/caac.21801. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
10
Cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州的癌症差异。
J Rural Health. 2024 Jan;40(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12763. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
信念移山:阿巴拉契亚宫颈癌预防项目
Am J Health Behav. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):627-38. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.33.6.1.
4
The impact of human papillomavirus information on perceived risk of cervical cancer.人乳头瘤病毒信息对宫颈癌感知风险的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Feb;18(2):373-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0357. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
5
Misleading tests of health behavior theories.健康行为理论的误导性测试。
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3301_1.
6
Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned.基于教会的健康促进干预措施:证据与经验教训。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:213-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016.
7
Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States.《美国的八个群体:调查美国不同种族、县以及种族与县组合之间的死亡率差异》
PLoS Med. 2006 Sep;3(9):e260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260.
8
An in-depth and updated perspective on determinants of cervical cancer screening among central Appalachian women.对阿巴拉契亚中部女性宫颈癌筛查决定因素的深入且最新的见解。
Women Health. 2005;42(2):89-105. doi: 10.1300/j013v42n02_06.
9
Comparative analysis of invasive cervical cancer incidence rates in three Appalachian states.阿巴拉契亚三个州浸润性宫颈癌发病率的比较分析。
Prev Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;41(5-6):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
10
Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance.量身定制且有的放矢的健康传播:增强信息相关性的策略
Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s3.6.