• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭血压远程监测和病例管理以控制高血压的设计和原理(HyperLink):一项集群随机试验。

Design and rationale for Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Case Management to Control Hypertension (HyperLink): a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.014
PMID:22498720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3361626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with high blood pressure (BP) visit a physician an average of 4 times or more per year in the U.S., yet BP is controlled in fewer than half. Practical, robust and sustainable models are needed to improve BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

The Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Case Management to Control Hypertension study (HyperLink) is a cluster-randomized trial designed to determine whether an intervention that combines home BP telemonitoring with pharmacist case management improves BP control compared to usual care at 6 and 12 months in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Secondary outcomes are maintenance of BP control at 18 months, patient satisfaction with their health care, and costs of care.

METHODS

HyperLink enrolled 450 hypertensive patients with uncontrolled BP from 16 primary care clinics. Eight clinics were randomized to provide usual care (UC) to their patients (n=222) and 8 were randomized to provide the telemonitoring intervention (TI) (n=228). TI patients received home BP telemonitors that internally store and electronically transmit BP data to a secure database. Pharmacist case managers adjust antihypertensive therapy based on the home BP data under a collaborative practice agreement with the clinics' primary care teams. The length of the intervention is 12 months, with follow-up to 18 months to determine the durability of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We will test in a real primary care setting whether combining BP telemonitoring and pharmacist case management can achieve and maintain high rates of BP control compared to usual care.

摘要

背景

美国高血压患者(BP)平均每年就诊 4 次或以上,但血压控制率不足一半。需要切实可行、可持续的模式来改善血压控制不良的高血压患者的血压。

目的

家庭血压远程监测和病例管理以控制高血压研究(HyperLink)是一项集群随机试验,旨在确定家庭血压远程监测与药剂师病例管理相结合的干预措施是否与常规护理相比,能在 6 个月和 12 个月时改善血压控制不良患者的血压控制情况。次要结局是 18 个月时血压控制的维持情况、患者对其医疗保健的满意度和医疗保健成本。

方法

HyperLink 纳入了 16 家初级保健诊所的 450 名血压控制不良的高血压患者。8 家诊所随机分配为其患者提供常规护理(UC)(n=222),8 家诊所随机分配为提供远程监测干预(TI)(n=228)。TI 患者使用家庭血压远程监测仪,该监测仪可内部存储并通过电子方式将血压数据传输到安全数据库。药剂师病例经理根据家庭血压数据,根据与诊所初级保健团队的合作实践协议调整降压治疗。干预时间为 12 个月,随访至 18 个月,以确定干预的持久性。

结论

我们将在真实的初级保健环境中测试,家庭血压远程监测和药剂师病例管理相结合是否可以比常规护理实现并维持更高的血压控制率。

相似文献

1
Design and rationale for Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Case Management to Control Hypertension (HyperLink): a cluster randomized trial.家庭血压远程监测和病例管理以控制高血压的设计和原理(HyperLink):一项集群随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
2
Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):46-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6549.
3
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制不佳的成年人血压影响的长期结果:一项集群随机临床试验的随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617.
4
Comparative effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPTM) plus nurse case management versus HBPTM alone among Black and Hispanic stroke survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.黑人与西班牙裔中风幸存者中家庭血压远程监测(HBPTM)加护士病例管理与单纯HBPTM的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 15;16:97. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0605-5.
5
Key components of success in a randomized trial of blood pressure telemonitoring with medication therapy management pharmacists.血压远程监测与药物治疗管理药剂师随机试验成功的关键组成部分。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Nov-Dec;58(6):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work?一项成功的多方面改善基层医疗中高血压控制的试验:为何奏效?
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1665-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3355-x.
7
Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理用于控制不佳的高血压的心血管事件和成本。
Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15492. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework.电子通信与家庭血压监测(e-BP)研究:设计、实施与评估框架
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May;29(3):376-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
9
Economic evaluation of home blood pressure telemonitoring: a randomized controlled trial.家庭血压远程监测的经济学评估:一项随机对照试验。
Blood Press. 2011 Apr;20(2):117-25. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2010.532306. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Telemonitoring based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension: multicentre randomised controlled trial.基于远程监测的服务再设计在未经控制的高血压管理中的应用:多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2013 May 24;346:f3030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3030.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of telepharmacy on hypertension management in the United Arab Emirates.远程药学对阿拉伯联合酋长国高血压管理的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):2734. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2734. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
2
Effect of a Telephone Health Coaching Intervention on Hypertension Control in Young Adults: The MyHEART Randomized Clinical Trial.电话健康教练干预对年轻人高血压控制的影响:MyHEART 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55618.
3
Comparison of explanatory and pragmatic design choices in a cluster-randomized hypertension trial: effects on enrollment, participant characteristics, and adherence.

本文引用的文献

1
Home blood pressure management and improved blood pressure control: results from a randomized controlled trial.家庭血压管理与血压控制改善:一项随机对照试验的结果
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1173-80. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.276.
2
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2007年总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Nov 3(27):1-32.
3
Recent trends in the prevalence of high blood pressure and its treatment and control, 1999-2008.1999 - 2008年高血压患病率及其治疗与控制的近期趋势
在一项以群组为基础的高血压试验中,解释性与实用主义设计选择的比较:对入组、参与者特征和依从性的影响。
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06611-3.
4
Consumer Devices for Patient-Generated Health Data Using Blood Pressure Monitors for Managing Hypertension: Systematic Review.消费者可用于生成健康数据的设备——利用血压监测仪管理高血压:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 2;10(5):e33261. doi: 10.2196/33261.
5
Systematic Review of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring With Support: Intervention Effectiveness and Cost.有支持的自我血压监测系统评价:干预效果和成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):285-298. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.025. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人预防心血管疾病初级预防药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 26;3(3):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub3.
7
Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理用于控制不佳的高血压的心血管事件和成本。
Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15492. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Rationale and study design of the MyHEART study: A young adult hypertension self-management randomized controlled trial.研究背景和设计:MyHEART 研究:一项针对青年高血压患者的自我管理随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Mar;78:88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制不佳的成年人血压影响的长期结果:一项集群随机临床试验的随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617.
10
Economic Evaluation of the Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Case Management to Control Hypertension (Hyperlink) Trial.家庭血压远程监测与药剂师病例管理控制高血压(超链接)试验的经济学评估
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;1(1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1001. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Oct(48):1-8.
4
Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.护士主导的干预措施以改善高血压患者的血压控制:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 23;341:c3995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3995.
5
Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial.远程监测和自我管理在高血压控制中的应用(TASMINH2):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 17;376(9736):163-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60964-6. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
6
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.美国高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率趋势,1988-2008 年。
JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2043-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.650.
7
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.用于改善高血压患者血压控制的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD005182. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005182.pub4.
8
Physician and pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.医生与药剂师合作以改善血压控制。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1996-2002. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.358.
9
Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial.两种自我管理干预措施对改善高血压控制的效果:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):687-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00148.
10
The potency of team-based care interventions for hypertension: a meta-analysis.基于团队的高血压护理干预措施的效力:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 26;169(19):1748-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.316.