Wang Man-Ling, Dai Chun-Yi, Huei-Ming Ma Matthew, Chang Kuan-Wu, Lin Chih-Peng, Sun Wei-Zen
Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, ROC.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012 Mar;50(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Effective airway management requires both proper technique and the appropriate devices. With the widespread implementation of advanced life-support techniques in emergency medical services (EMS), orotracheal intubation is now performed not only by professional practitioners but, in many occasions, nonprofessionals. With extensively diversified skill equipped, we tested whether the Sunscope, a patented tracheal intubation device with a digital display, is able to facilitate tracheal intubation by naïve EMS personnel with various training backgrounds.
We conducted a study to determine rate of success and time required to insert an orotracheal tube into a mannequin using Sunscope. The participants were placed into the professional group (i.e., anesthesiologists and emergency medical paramedics; EMT-P) or the nonprofessional group (i.e., emergency medical technicians; EMT). Intubation required three steps: equipment preparation, vocal cord exposure, and tube insertion. The time required for each step was recorded by a senior staff member, and the data were analyzed by nonparametric statistics.
Each consecutive step in the operating procedure was significantly shorter for the professional group in comparison with the nonprofessional group during the first trial: equipment preparation, 10.5 ± 2.1 vs. 11.9 ± 4.1 seconds; vocal cord exposure, 7.4 ± 7.7 vs. 12.2 ± 7.7 seconds; tube insertion, 8.8 ± 4.8 vs. 17.6 ± 9.4 seconds; and total time required for intubation, 26.7 ± 8.8 vs. 35.8 ± 19.6 seconds. The professional practitioners showed no significant improvement, in terms of time reduction, on the following three trials. On the other hand, the nonprofessional practitioners showed no significant differences, in terms of time required to expose the vocal cords and total operation time, following the third trial in comparison with the professional practitioners.
Our research demonstrates that professional practitioners are able to use the Sunscope on their first attempt. Despite a lack of training in conventional endotracheal intubation, emergency medical technicians (EMT-I and -II) were able to complete intubation on their first attempt; a significant reduction in the time required to intubate was noted after repeated practice. All levels of naïve EMTs were able to readily visualize the vocal cords through Sunscope and, thereby, reliably insert the endotracheal tube in less than 1 minute, regardless of their skills before testing.
有效的气道管理既需要恰当的技术,也需要合适的设备。随着高级生命支持技术在紧急医疗服务(EMS)中的广泛应用,经口气管插管现在不仅由专业从业者进行,而且在许多情况下也由非专业人员进行。鉴于技能的广泛多样化,我们测试了一种带有数字显示屏的专利气管插管设备Sunscope是否能够帮助各种培训背景的新手EMS人员进行气管插管。
我们进行了一项研究,以确定使用Sunscope将经口气管导管插入人体模型的成功率和所需时间。参与者被分为专业组(即麻醉医生和急救医疗护理人员;EMT-P)或非专业组(即急救医疗技术员;EMT)。插管需要三个步骤:设备准备、声带暴露和导管插入。每个步骤所需时间由一名资深工作人员记录,并通过非参数统计分析数据。
在第一次试验中,与非专业组相比,专业组在操作程序中的每个连续步骤都明显更短:设备准备,10.5±2.1秒对11.9±4.1秒;声带暴露,7.4±7.7秒对12.2±7.7秒;导管插入,8.8±4.8秒对17.6±9.4秒;插管所需总时间,26.7±8.8秒对35.8±19.6秒。在接下来的三次试验中,专业从业者在时间缩短方面没有显著改善。另一方面,与专业从业者相比,非专业从业者在第三次试验后,在暴露声带所需时间和总操作时间方面没有显著差异。
我们的研究表明,专业从业者能够首次尝试使用Sunscope。尽管缺乏传统气管插管的培训,但急救医疗技术员(EMT-I和-II)能够首次尝试完成插管;反复练习后,插管所需时间显著减少。无论测试前技能如何,所有水平的新手急救医疗技术员都能够通过Sunscope轻松看到声带,从而在不到1分钟的时间内可靠地插入气管导管。