Physics Department, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):2891-903. doi: 10.1121/1.3688474.
This study focuses on the theoretical prediction and experimental evaluation of the latency of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Response components with different delay have been identified in several studies. The main generator of the transient response is assumed to be coherent reflection from cochlear roughness near the resonant place. Additional components of different latency can be generated by different mechanisms. Experimental data are re-analyzed in this study to evaluate the dependence of the latency on stimulus level, for each component of the response, showing that previous estimates of the otoacoustic emission latency were affected by systematic errors. The latency of the emission from each generator changes very little with stimulus level, whereas their different growth rate causes sharp changes of the single-valued latency, estimated as the time of the absolute maximum of the bandpass filtered response. Results of passive linear models, in which gain and bandwidth of the cochlear amplifier are strictly related, are incompatible with the observations. Although active linear models including delayed stiffness terms do predict much slower dependence of latency on the stimulus level, a suitable nonlinear model should be designed, capable of decoupling more effectively the dependence on stimulus level of amplitude and phase of the otoacoustic response.
本研究专注于瞬态诱发耳声发射潜伏期的理论预测和实验评估。在几项研究中,已经确定了具有不同延迟的响应分量。瞬态响应的主要产生器假定为在共振点附近的耳蜗粗糙度的相干反射。不同潜伏期的附加分量可以由不同的机制产生。本研究重新分析了实验数据,以评估每个响应分量的潜伏期对刺激水平的依赖性,表明先前对耳声发射潜伏期的估计受到系统误差的影响。每个发生器的发射潜伏期随刺激水平的变化很小,而它们不同的增长率导致单值潜伏期的急剧变化,估计为带通滤波响应的绝对最大值的时间。增益和耳蜗放大器带宽严格相关的被动线性模型的结果与观察结果不兼容。尽管包括延迟刚度项的主动线性模型确实预测了潜伏期对刺激水平的依赖性要慢得多,但应该设计一个合适的非线性模型,能够更有效地解耦耳声响应的幅度和相位对刺激水平的依赖性。