• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国老年女性的乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查及其相关因素

Breast and colorectal cancer screening and associated correlates among Chinese older women.

作者信息

Leung Doris Y P, Leung Angela Y M, Chi Iris

机构信息

The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):283-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.283.

DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.283
PMID:22502686
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the participation rates for breast and colorectal cancer screening and identify associated correlates among elderly women.

METHODS

Logistic regressions were conducted using data collected in 2006 from 1,533 elderly women aged 60 years or above who had completed a screening instrument, the Minimum Data Set-Home Care, while applying for long-term care services at the first time in Hong Kong.

RESULTS

The participation rates for breast and colorectal cancer screening among frail older Chinese women were 3.7% and 10.8% respectively. Cognitive status was inversely associated with the likelihood of participation in screening (breast: OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.47-0.94; colon: OR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.66-0.99), as was educational level with the likelihood of participation in breast cancer screening (no formal education: OR = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.06-0.61, some primary education: OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.10-1.00).

CONCLUSION

The delivery of cancer preventive health services to frail older women is less than ideal. Cognitive status and educational level were important factors in cancer screening behaviour. Tailor-made strategic promotion programmes targeting older women with low cognitive status and educational levels are needed to enhance awareness and acceptance within this vulnerable group.

摘要

目的

探讨老年女性乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的参与率,并确定相关的影响因素。

方法

采用2006年收集的数据进行逻辑回归分析,这些数据来自1533名60岁及以上的老年女性,她们在香港首次申请长期护理服务时完成了一份筛查工具——《最小数据集-家庭护理》。

结果

体弱的中国老年女性中,乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的参与率分别为3.7%和10.8%。认知状态与参与筛查的可能性呈负相关(乳腺癌:比值比=0.66,95%置信区间=0.47-0.94;结肠癌:比值比=0.81,95%置信区间=0.66-0.99),教育水平与参与乳腺癌筛查的可能性也呈负相关(未接受正规教育:比值比=0.20,95%置信区间=0.06-0.61;接受过一些小学教育:比值比=0.31,95%置信区间=0.10-1.00)。

结论

向体弱的老年女性提供癌症预防保健服务的情况不太理想。认知状态和教育水平是癌症筛查行为的重要因素。需要针对认知状态和教育水平较低的老年女性制定有针对性的战略推广计划,以提高这一弱势群体的意识和接受度。

相似文献

1
Breast and colorectal cancer screening and associated correlates among Chinese older women.中国老年女性的乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查及其相关因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):283-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.283.
2
Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence: Effect of Low Body Mass Index in Women.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的依从性:女性低体重指数的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jul;29(7):996-1006. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7739. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区女性的教育水平、自愿私人医疗保险与机会性癌症筛查
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999 Oct;8(5):427-34. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199910000-00008.
4
The education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe?癌症筛查参与的教育梯度:欧洲普遍存在的现象?
Int J Public Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1045-7. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Cancer preventive services, socioeconomic status, and the Affordable Care Act.癌症预防服务、社会经济地位与《平价医疗法案》
Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1585-1589. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30476. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
[Analysis of predictive factors for non-adherence to organized screening for colorectal and breast cancers in the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019) in Lombardy Region (Northern Italy)].[意大利北部伦巴第大区大流行前时期(2018 - 2019年)结直肠癌和乳腺癌有组织筛查不依从的预测因素分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2024 Mar-Apr;48(2):118-129. doi: 10.19191/EP24.2.A720.039.
7
Possible logistic and sociodemographyc factors on breast cancer screening in Turkey: lessons from a women’s health project in Mersin province.土耳其乳腺癌筛查中可能的后勤和社会人口学因素:来自梅尔辛省一项女性健康项目的经验教训。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(2):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0270-7.
8
Determinants of participation in a breast cancer screening trial in trivandrum district, India.印度特里凡得琅地区乳腺癌筛查试验参与情况的决定因素。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7301-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.12.7301.
9
Determinants of cancer screening awareness and participation among Indonesian women.印度尼西亚女性癌症筛查意识和参与度的决定因素。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 6;18(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4125-z.
10
"Don't know" and accuracy of breast cancer risk perceptions among Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program: implications for educational interventions and patient empowerment.参与流动乳腺钼靶检查项目的阿巴拉契亚女性对乳腺癌风险认知中的“不知道”情况及其准确性:对教育干预和患者赋权的启示
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Dec;29(4):669-79. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0621-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological correlates of free colorectal cancer screening uptake in a Scottish sample: a cross-sectional observational study.苏格兰人群中免费结直肠癌筛查参与的心理相关因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e042210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042210.
2
Interventions to Reduce Healthcare Disparities in Cancer Screening Among Minority Adults: a Systematic Review.减少少数族裔成年人癌症筛查中医疗保健差异的干预措施:系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Feb;8(1):107-126. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00763-1. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Patient delay and associated factors among Chinese women with breast cancer: A cross-sectional study.
中国乳腺癌女性患者的就医延迟及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(40):e17454. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017454.
4
Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies.中国人结直肠癌筛查的影响因素:定量研究综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 17;13(5):506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050506.
5
Cognitive ability and personality as predictors of participation in a national colorectal cancer screening programme: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.认知能力和人格作为参与全国结直肠癌筛查项目的预测因素:英国老龄化纵向研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jun;69(6):530-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204888. Epub 2015 Feb 3.