• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症预防服务、社会经济地位与《平价医疗法案》

Cancer preventive services, socioeconomic status, and the Affordable Care Act.

作者信息

Cooper Gregory S, Kou Tzuyung Doug, Dor Avi, Koroukian Siran M, Schluchter Mark D

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1585-1589. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30476. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30476
PMID:28067955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5400670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Out-of-pocket expenditures are thought to be an important barrier to the receipt of cancer preventive services, especially for those of a lower socioeconomic status (SES). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) eliminated out-of-pocket expenditures for recommended services, including mammography and colonoscopy. The objective of this study was to determine changes in the uptake of mammography and colonoscopy among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries before and after ACA implementation.

METHODS

Using Medicare claims data, this study identified women who were 70 years old or older and had not undergone mammography in the previous 2 years and men and women who were 70 years old or older, were at increased risk for colorectal cancer, and had not undergone colonoscopy in the past 5 years. The receipt of procedures in the 2-year period before the ACA's implementation (2009-2010) and after its implementation (2011 to September 2012) was also identified. Multivariate generalized estimating equation models were used to determine the independent association and county-level quartile of median income and education with the receipt of testing.

RESULTS

For mammography, a lower SES quartile was associated with less uptake, but the post-ACA disparities were smaller than those in the pre-ACA period. In addition, mammography rates increased from the pre-ACA period to the post-ACA period in all SES quartiles. For colonoscopy, in both the pre- and post-ACA periods, there was an association between uptake and educational level and, to some extent, income. However, there were no appreciable changes in colonoscopy and SES after implementation of the ACA.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of out-of-pocket expenditures may overcome a barrier to the receipt of recommended preventive services, but for colonoscopy, other procedural factors may remain as deterrents. Cancer 2017;123:1585-1589. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

自付费用被认为是获得癌症预防服务的一个重要障碍,对于社会经济地位较低的人群(SES)而言尤其如此。《平价医疗法案》(ACA)取消了包括乳房X光检查和结肠镜检查在内的推荐服务的自付费用。本研究的目的是确定在ACA实施前后,按服务收费的医疗保险受益人群中乳房X光检查和结肠镜检查的接受率变化。

方法

利用医疗保险理赔数据,本研究确定了年龄在70岁及以上且在过去2年内未接受过乳房X光检查的女性,以及年龄在70岁及以上、患结直肠癌风险增加且在过去5年内未接受过结肠镜检查的男性和女性。同时还确定了ACA实施前(2009 - 2010年)和实施后(2011年至2012年9月)这两个时间段内这些检查的接受情况。使用多变量广义估计方程模型来确定接受检查与收入中位数和教育程度的县级四分位数之间的独立关联。

结果

对于乳房X光检查,较低的SES四分位数与接受率较低相关,但ACA实施后的差距小于实施前。此外,所有SES四分位数的乳房X光检查率从ACA实施前到实施后均有所上升。对于结肠镜检查,在ACA实施前和实施后,接受率与教育水平以及在一定程度上与收入之间均存在关联。然而,ACA实施后结肠镜检查与SES之间没有明显变化。

结论

取消自付费用可能会克服接受推荐预防服务的障碍,但对于结肠镜检查,其他程序因素可能仍然是阻碍因素。《癌症》2017年;123:1585 - 1589。©2017美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Cancer preventive services, socioeconomic status, and the Affordable Care Act.癌症预防服务、社会经济地位与《平价医疗法案》
Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1585-1589. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30476. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Changes in Receipt of Cancer Screening in Medicare Beneficiaries Following the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后医疗保险受益人群癌症筛查接受情况的变化
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 6;108(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv374. Print 2016 May.
3
Rural-urban disparities in colonoscopies after the elimination of patient cost-sharing by the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案取消患者自付费用后,结肠镜检查在城乡之间的差异。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129:105877. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105877. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nationwide High-deductible Health Plan Before and After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前后全国性高免赔额健康计划中的结直肠癌筛查
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):466-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000521.
5
Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization.医疗保险消除癌症筛查费用分担对利用率的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4135-9.
6
ACA-mandated elimination of cost sharing for preventive screening has had limited early impact.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)规定取消预防性筛查的费用分摊,但早期影响有限。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):511-7.
7
Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后,有保险的就业女性的乳房 X 光筛查利用率和费用分担情况。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jun;16(6):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
8
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Receipt of Colonoscopies among the Insured Elderly.平价医疗法案对参保老年人接受结肠镜检查的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010313.
9
Decomposing socioeconomic disparities in the use of colonoscopy among the insured elderly population before and after the Affordable Care Act.在平价医疗法案前后,对参保老年人群体结肠镜检查使用情况的社会经济差异进行分解。
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Nov;31(11):1039-1048. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01343-8. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
10
Use of preventive services by Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries: does spillover from managed care matter?医疗保险按服务收费受益人对预防性服务的使用:管理式医疗的溢出效应重要吗?
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):445-52. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160376.42562.79.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening and the COVID-19 Pandemic.乳腺癌筛查与新冠疫情
J Breast Imaging. 2021 Jan 26;3(1):3-11. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa106.
2
Inequity in Cancer and Cancer Care Delivery in the United States.美国癌症与癌症医疗服务提供中的不平等现象。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Cadmium, Lead, Chronic Physiological Stress and Endometrial Cancer: How Environmental Policy Can Alter the Exposure of At-Risk Women in the United States.镉、铅、慢性生理应激与子宫内膜癌:环境政策如何改变美国高危女性的暴露情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(9):1278. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091278.
4
Behaviour within a Clinical Trial and Implications for Mammography Guidelines.临床试验中的行为及其对乳腺钼靶检查指南的影响。
Rev Econ Stud. 2023 Jan;90(1):432-462. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdac022. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Long-Term Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Colorectal Cancer Screening in Its Targeted Population.医疗补助扩大对目标人群结直肠癌筛查的长期影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 May;68(5):1780-1790. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07797-x. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.癌症筛查的健康经济学研究:研究机会、挑战与未来方向。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Jul 5;2022(59):42-50. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac008.
7
Effects of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program.大肠癌防治计划之成效。
Health Econ. 2021 Nov;30(11):2667-2685. doi: 10.1002/hec.4397. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
8
Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms.筛查与选择:乳房X光检查的案例
Am Econ Rev. 2020 Dec;110(12):3836-3870. doi: 10.1257/aer.20191191.
9
Bias Issues in Colorectal Cancer Management: A Review.结直肠癌管理中的偏见问题:综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2166-2173. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10232-6. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Understanding Racial Disparities in Gastrointestinal Cancer Outcomes: Lack of Surgery Contributes to Lower Survival in African American Patients.理解胃肠道癌结局中的种族差异:缺乏手术导致非裔美国患者的生存率降低。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):529-538. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0950. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nationwide High-deductible Health Plan Before and After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前后全国性高免赔额健康计划中的结直肠癌筛查
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):466-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000521.
2
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Affordable Care Act Provision Lowered Out-Of-Pocket Cost And Increased Colonoscopy Rates Among Men In Medicare.《平价医疗法案》条款降低了医疗保险中男性的自付费用并提高了结肠镜检查率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2069-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0571.
4
Changes in Receipt of Cancer Screening in Medicare Beneficiaries Following the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后医疗保险受益人群癌症筛查接受情况的变化
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 6;108(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv374. Print 2016 May.
5
ACA-mandated elimination of cost sharing for preventive screening has had limited early impact.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)规定取消预防性筛查的费用分摊,但早期影响有限。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):511-7.
6
Mammography Screening in a Large Health System Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and the Affordable Care Act.在遵循美国预防服务工作组建议及《平价医疗法案》的大型医疗系统中进行的乳腺钼靶筛查
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131903. eCollection 2015.
7
Elimination of cost-sharing and receipt of screening for colorectal and breast cancer.取消费用分担以及接受结直肠癌和乳腺癌筛查。
Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;121(18):3272-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29494. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
A slow start: Use of preventive services among seniors following the Affordable Care Act's enhancement of Medicare benefits in the U.S.缓慢的开端:美国《平价医疗法案》加强医疗保险福利后老年人预防性服务的使用情况
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
9
Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.美国 2015 年癌症筛查:对当前美国癌症协会指南和癌症筛查中当前问题的回顾。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):30-54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21261. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data.利用医疗保险索赔数据区分筛查性和诊断性乳房 X 光检查。
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):e44-51. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0f5.