• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of the exception from informed consent regulations in a large multicenter emergency clinical trials network: the RAMPART experience.在一个大型多中心急诊临床试验网络中实施知情同意豁免规定:RAMPART 经验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):448-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01328.x.
2
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.知情同意的例外情况:机构审查委员会的观点——平衡对受试者的风险、社区咨询及未来方向
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015.
3
Using the exception from informed consent regulations in research.在研究中使用知情同意法规的例外情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1031-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.021.
4
An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations.对知情同意法规豁免情况的伦理分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1113-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.532.
5
Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations.紧急研究:使用知情同意豁免,评估社区咨询。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):98-103. doi: 10.1111/acem.12039.
6
Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.符合知情同意紧急例外情况的研究条件。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1040-4. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.022.
7
Resuscitation research involving vulnerable populations: are additional protections needed for emergency exception from informed consent?涉及弱势群体的复苏研究:紧急情况下豁免知情同意是否需要额外保护?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1071-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.020.
8
Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?知情同意程序的紧急例外情况是否能保护研究对象?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.001.
9
Design and implementation of community consultation for research conducted under exception from informed consent regulations for the PreVent and the PreVent 2 trials: Changes over time and during the COVID-19 pandemic.在预防和预防 2 试验中,根据知情同意豁免规定进行的研究的社区咨询的设计和实施:随时间的变化和在 COVID-19 大流行期间的变化。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):671-680. doi: 10.1177/17407745241243045. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
10
A 20-year Review: The Use of Exception From Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent in Emergency Research.二十年回顾:在紧急研究中使用免除知情同意和放弃知情同意。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(10):1169-1177. doi: 10.1111/acem.13438. Epub 2018 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The California Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (CAL-ROC): A novel collaboration to facilitate the implementation of randomized clinical trials in the prehospital setting.加利福尼亚复苏结果联盟(CAL-ROC):一项旨在促进在院前环境中开展随机临床试验实施的新型合作。
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 28;24:100992. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100992. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Consent-Related Outcomes in the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Trial.阿替普酶与替奈普酶比较试验中的与同意相关的结局。
Neurology. 2024 Nov 26;103(10):e209974. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209974. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
Traumatic injury clinical trial evaluating tranexamic acid in children (TIC-TOC): A pilot randomized trial.儿童创伤性损伤氨甲环酸评估临床试验(TIC-TOC):一项初步随机试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;29(7):862-873. doi: 10.1111/acem.14481. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
Exception from informed consent in the era of social media: The SEGA stroke trial experience.社交媒体时代知情同意的例外情况:SEGA 中风试验经验。
Brain Circ. 2021 Dec 21;7(4):253-258. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_44_21. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
5
[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].[复苏伦理与生命终结决策]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):720-749. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00888-8. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
SCING-Spinal Cord Injury Neuroprotection with Glyburide: a pilot, open-label, multicentre, prospective evaluation of oral glyburide in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury in the USA.SCING-用格列本脲进行脊髓损伤神经保护:美国一项关于急性创伤性脊髓损伤患者口服格列本脲的先导性、开放标签、多中心前瞻性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e031329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031329.
7
Traumatic injury clinical trial evaluating tranexamic acid in children (TIC-TOC): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.儿童创伤性损伤中氨甲环酸评估的临床试验(TIC-TOC):一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 30;19(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2974-z.
8
Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?在紧急研究中保护研究参与者:试验开始前进行社区咨询是否足够?
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jul 12;2(1):e000084. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084. eCollection 2017.
9
Systemic Complications Following Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态后的全身并发症。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Feb 7;18(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0815-9.
10
Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.探讨在儿科复苏随机对照试验中,对同意的例外情况下替代决策人的体验:一项定性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 13;6(9):e012931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012931.

本文引用的文献

1
Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model.社区咨询和公开披露:新模式的初步结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):733-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01102.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
2
Regulatory challenges for the resuscitation outcomes consortium.复苏结果联盟面临的监管挑战。
Circulation. 2008 Oct 7;118(15):1585-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.764084.
3
The research on community consultation: an annotated bibliography.社区咨询研究:一份带注释的文献目录。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):346-52. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.01.002.
4
The birth of the NETT: NIH-funded network will launch emergency neurological trials.NETT的诞生:由美国国立卫生研究院资助的网络将启动紧急神经学试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):726-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.010.
5
Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent.关于使用知情同意豁免进行研究的联邦指南的研究现状
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1022-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.012.
6
Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience.利用知情同意的紧急例外情况进行研究:公众可及除颤(PAD)试验经验。
Resuscitation. 2004 Apr;61(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.11.016.
7
Comparative absorption kinetics of intramuscular midazolam and diazepam.肌肉注射咪达唑仑和地西泮的吸收动力学比较
Can J Anaesth. 1996 May;43(5 Pt 1):450-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03018105.
8
Midazolam and status epilepticus in children.咪达唑仑与儿童癫痫持续状态
Crit Care Med. 1994 Aug;22(8):1340-1. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199408000-00027.

在一个大型多中心急诊临床试验网络中实施知情同意豁免规定:RAMPART 经验。

Implementation of the exception from informed consent regulations in a large multicenter emergency clinical trials network: the RAMPART experience.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):448-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01328.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01328.x
PMID:22506949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3335290/
Abstract

Clinical trials investigating therapies for acutely and critically ill and injured patients in the earliest phases of treatment often can only be performed under regulations allowing for exception from informed consent (EFIC) for emergency research. Implementation of these regulations in multicenter clinical trials involves special challenges and opportunities. The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial (RAMPART), the first EFIC trial conducted by the Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) network, combined centralized resources and coordination with retention of local control and flexibility to facilitate compliance with the EFIC regulations. Specific methods used by the NETT included common tools for community consultation and public disclosure, sharing of experiences and knowledge, and reporting of aggregate results. Tracking of community consultation and public disclosure activities and feedback facilitates empirical research on EFIC methods in the network and supports quality improvements for future NETT trials. The NETT model used in RAMPART demonstrates how EFIC may be effectively performed in established clinical trial networks.

摘要

在治疗的最早阶段,对急性和危重病及创伤患者进行治疗的临床试验通常只能在允许对紧急研究豁免知情同意的规定下进行。在多中心临床试验中实施这些规定涉及特殊的挑战和机遇。快速抗惊厥药物到达前试验(RAMPART)是由神经急症治疗试验(NETT)网络进行的第一个豁免知情同意的试验,该试验结合了集中资源和协调,同时保留了对当地控制的保留和灵活性,以方便遵守豁免知情同意的规定。NETT 使用的具体方法包括社区咨询和公众披露的通用工具、经验和知识的共享,以及汇总结果的报告。跟踪社区咨询和公众披露活动以及反馈,有助于对网络中豁免知情同意方法进行实证研究,并支持未来 NETT 试验的质量改进。RAMPART 中使用的 NETT 模式展示了如何在既定的临床试验网络中有效地实施豁免知情同意。