Henry Blair, Perez Adic, Trpcic Sandy, Rizoli Sandro, Nascimento Barto
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Critical Care Medicine, Toronto, Canada.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jul 12;2(1):e000084. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084. eCollection 2017.
This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving the use of massive blood transfusions.
In 2012, our hospital conducted a CC, using a random digit dialling technique, to elicit the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of an exemption from informed consent for an upcoming clinical trial. A total of 500 participants from high violent crime areas were interviewed as part of this consultation.
The response rate for the telephone survey was 54%. Participants indicated a personal acceptance rate of 76%, acceptance of the justification for the exception to consent at 81%, thatthe study would meet the best interest of patients and the community at 81% and that youth (between 15 and 18 years) could be enrolled at 71%. When offered, no participant requested an opt-out wrist band to avoid being enrolled in this study.
The use of violent crime neighborhoods to locate at risk communities was not effective in identifying the appropriate community of interest for this study. Though only representing a small subpopulation from a large Canadian city, the attitudes noted here is suggestive that Canadians may have a similar level of acceptance as the US based on published studies. However, given the resources needed to undertake this process and that in the end it did not elicit any useful feedback or recommendations for enhancing the safety of participants, the future use of phone surveys as a means of engaging communities should be reconsidered.
This is a retrospective subanalysis of a CC using a randomized phone dialling technique from a site prior to the start of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial. The CC was not designed specifically for research purposes and as such reflect only a case study from a single center.
Pre-result, NCT01545232.
本文介绍了在安大略省多伦多市完成的一项社区咨询(CC)过程的结果,该过程采用随机数字拨号技术,旨在了解公众对在进行涉及大量输血的紧急研究时使用知情同意豁免的态度和看法。
2012年,我们医院采用随机数字拨号技术进行了一次社区咨询,以了解公众对即将开展的一项临床试验使用知情同意豁免的态度和看法。作为此次咨询的一部分,共采访了来自高暴力犯罪地区的500名参与者。
电话调查的回复率为54%。参与者表示个人接受率为76%,对同意豁免理由的接受率为81%,认为该研究符合患者和社区最佳利益的比例为81%,认为可以招募15至18岁青少年的比例为71%。在提供选择时,没有参与者要求佩戴退出腕带以避免参与本研究。
利用暴力犯罪社区来定位风险社区对于确定本研究的合适目标社区并不有效。尽管这里所指出的态度仅代表加拿大一个大城市中的一小部分亚人群体,但根据已发表的研究,这表明加拿大人的接受程度可能与美国类似。然而,考虑到开展这一过程所需的资源,且最终并未获得任何关于提高参与者安全性的有用反馈或建议,未来应重新考虑将电话调查作为吸引社区参与的一种方式。
V级:这是在实用随机优化血小板和血浆比例试验开始前,对一个地点采用随机电话拨号技术进行的社区咨询的回顾性子分析。该社区咨询并非专门为研究目的而设计,因此仅反映了一个单一中心的案例研究。
结果前,NCT01545232。