Suppr超能文献

在紧急研究中保护研究参与者:试验开始前进行社区咨询是否足够?

Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?

作者信息

Henry Blair, Perez Adic, Trpcic Sandy, Rizoli Sandro, Nascimento Barto

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Critical Care Medicine, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jul 12;2(1):e000084. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving the use of massive blood transfusions.

METHODS

In 2012, our hospital conducted a CC, using a random digit dialling technique, to elicit the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of an exemption from informed consent for an upcoming clinical trial. A total of 500 participants from high violent crime areas were interviewed as part of this consultation.

RESULTS

The response rate for the telephone survey was 54%. Participants indicated a personal acceptance rate of 76%, acceptance of the justification for the exception to consent at 81%, thatthe study would meet the best interest of patients and the community at 81% and that youth (between 15 and 18 years) could be enrolled at 71%. When offered, no participant requested an opt-out wrist band to avoid being enrolled in this study.

DISCUSSION

The use of violent crime neighborhoods to locate at risk communities was not effective in identifying the appropriate community of interest for this study. Though only representing a small subpopulation from a large Canadian city, the attitudes noted here is suggestive that Canadians may have a similar level of acceptance as the US based on published studies. However, given the resources needed to undertake this process and that in the end it did not elicit any useful feedback or recommendations for enhancing the safety of participants, the future use of phone surveys as a means of engaging communities should be reconsidered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL V

This is a retrospective subanalysis of a CC using a randomized phone dialling technique from a site prior to the start of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial. The CC was not designed specifically for research purposes and as such reflect only a case study from a single center.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Pre-result, NCT01545232.

摘要

背景

本文介绍了在安大略省多伦多市完成的一项社区咨询(CC)过程的结果,该过程采用随机数字拨号技术,旨在了解公众对在进行涉及大量输血的紧急研究时使用知情同意豁免的态度和看法。

方法

2012年,我们医院采用随机数字拨号技术进行了一次社区咨询,以了解公众对即将开展的一项临床试验使用知情同意豁免的态度和看法。作为此次咨询的一部分,共采访了来自高暴力犯罪地区的500名参与者。

结果

电话调查的回复率为54%。参与者表示个人接受率为76%,对同意豁免理由的接受率为81%,认为该研究符合患者和社区最佳利益的比例为81%,认为可以招募15至18岁青少年的比例为71%。在提供选择时,没有参与者要求佩戴退出腕带以避免参与本研究。

讨论

利用暴力犯罪社区来定位风险社区对于确定本研究的合适目标社区并不有效。尽管这里所指出的态度仅代表加拿大一个大城市中的一小部分亚人群体,但根据已发表的研究,这表明加拿大人的接受程度可能与美国类似。然而,考虑到开展这一过程所需的资源,且最终并未获得任何关于提高参与者安全性的有用反馈或建议,未来应重新考虑将电话调查作为吸引社区参与的一种方式。

证据级别

V级:这是在实用随机优化血小板和血浆比例试验开始前,对一个地点采用随机电话拨号技术进行的社区咨询的回顾性子分析。该社区咨询并非专门为研究目的而设计,因此仅反映了一个单一中心的案例研究。

试验注册号

结果前,NCT01545232。

相似文献

1
Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jul 12;2(1):e000084. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084. eCollection 2017.
3
4
A community consultation survey to evaluate support for and success of the IMMEDIATE trial.
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):178-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774514526476.
6
The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent.
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;53(3):341-50, 350.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.021. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
9
Patient and Surrogate Postenrollment Perspectives on Research Using the Exception From Informed Consent: An Integrated Survey.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;76(3):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Learning from experience: a systematic review of community consultation acceptance data.
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):162-71.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation.
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
4
Community consultation for prehospital research: experiences of study coordinators and principal investigators.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):274-81. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.856503. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
Why persons choose to opt out of an exception from informed consent cardiac arrest trial.
Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):825-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
7
Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):157-65; discussion 165-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318278908a.
10
Ischemic stroke survivors' opinion regarding research utilizing exception from informed consent.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(4):321-6. doi: 10.1159/000328815. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验