Suppr超能文献

肌肉注射咪达唑仑和地西泮的吸收动力学比较

Comparative absorption kinetics of intramuscular midazolam and diazepam.

作者信息

Hung O R, Dyck J B, Varvel J, Shafer S L, Stanski D R

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1996 May;43(5 Pt 1):450-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03018105.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigates the rate and extent of absorption following intramuscular injection of midazolam and diazepam.

METHODS

Four healthy male volunteers were recruited in this randomized three-way cross-over study. On one occasion each subject received simultaneous im injections of 5 mg midazolam and 10 mg diazepam in separate deltoid muscles. On two other separate occasions each subject received an iv infusion of 7.5 mg midazolam and 30 mg diazepam over five minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples were collected for up to two hours and venous blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours for midazolam and ten days for diazepam. A gas chromatography assay was used to determine the plasma concentrations of midazolam and diazepam. The im absorption profiles were estimated using constrained least-squares deconvolution.

RESULTS

There were substantial intersubject variabilities in the estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (volume and clearances) of intravenous midazolam and diazepam. The mean (+/-sd) time to peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was shorter for im midazolam (17.5 +/- 6.5 min) relative to diazepam (33.8 +/- 7.5 min). The mean (+sd) time to peak absorption rate was also shorter for midazolam (9 +/- 2 vs 13.8 +/- 7.5 min). The peak rate of absorption was identical (0.18 mg. min-1) and bioavailability was 1.0 for both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that midazolam has more rapid absorption than diazepam following im administration.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了肌内注射咪达唑仑和地西泮后的吸收速率和程度。

方法

本随机三向交叉研究招募了4名健康男性志愿者。在一次试验中,每位受试者在三角肌分别同时肌内注射5毫克咪达唑仑和10毫克地西泮。在另外两次单独试验中,每位受试者在5分钟内静脉输注7.5毫克咪达唑仑和30毫克地西泮。频繁采集动脉血样长达2小时,采集静脉血样长达24小时用于检测咪达唑仑,长达10天用于检测地西泮。采用气相色谱分析法测定咪达唑仑和地西泮的血浆浓度。使用约束最小二乘反卷积估计肌内注射吸收曲线。

结果

静脉注射咪达唑仑和地西泮的估计药代动力学参数(体积和清除率)存在显著的个体间差异。肌内注射咪达唑仑的平均(±标准差)血浆浓度达峰时间(Cmax)(17.5±6.5分钟)比地西泮(33.8±7.5分钟)短。咪达唑仑的平均(±标准差)达峰吸收速率时间也较短(9±2分钟对13.8±7.5分钟)。两种药物的吸收峰值速率相同(0.18毫克·分钟⁻¹),生物利用度均为1.0。

结论

我们得出结论,肌内注射后咪达唑仑的吸收比地西泮更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验