Suppr超能文献

动力障碍样消化不良患者中质子泵抑制剂与 H2 受体拮抗剂加促动力药物的比较。

Comparison of PPIs and H2-receptor antagonists plus prokinetics for dysmotility-like dyspepsia.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Moriguchi Keijinkai Hospital, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr 7;18(13):1517-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i13.1517.

Abstract

AIM

To compare efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with H(2)-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) plus prokinetics (Proks) for dysmotility-like symptoms in functional dyspepsia (FD).

METHODS

Subjects were randomized to receive open-label treatment with either rabeprazole 10 mg od (n = 57) or famotidine 10 mg bid plus mosapride 5 mg tid (n = 57) for 4 wk. The primary efficacy endpoint was change (%) from baseline in total dysmotility-like dyspepsia symptom score. The secondary efficacy endpoint was patient satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS

The improvement in dysmotility-like dyspepsia symptom score on day 28 was significantly greater in the rabeprazole group (22.5% ± 29.2% of baseline) than the famotidine + mosapride group (53.2% ± 58.6% of baseline, P < 0.0001). The superior benefit of rabeprazole treatment after 28 d was consistent regardless of Helicobacter pylori status. Significantly more subjects in the rabeprazole group were satisfied or very satisfied with treatment on day 28 than in the famotidine + mosapride group (87.7% vs 59.6%, P = 0.0012). Rabeprazole therapy was the only significant predictor of treatment response (P < 0.0001), defined as a total symptom score improvement ≥ 50%.

CONCLUSION

PPI monotherapy improves dysmotility-like symptoms significantly better than H(2)RAs plus Proks, and should be the treatment of first choice for Japanese FD.

摘要

目的

比较质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)与 H2 受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)加促动力药(Proks)治疗功能性消化不良(FD)动力障碍样症状的疗效。

方法

受试者随机接受兰索拉唑 10mg 每日一次(n=57)或法莫替丁 10mg 每日两次加莫沙必利 5mg 每日三次(n=57)的开放标签治疗,疗程为 4 周。主要疗效终点是总动力障碍样消化不良症状评分从基线的变化(%)。次要疗效终点是患者对治疗的满意度。

结果

在第 28 天,兰索拉唑组(基线的 22.5%±29.2%)的动力障碍样消化不良症状评分改善明显大于法莫替丁+莫沙必利组(基线的 53.2%±58.6%,P<0.0001)。28 天后,兰索拉唑治疗的优势无论幽门螺杆菌状态如何均一致。第 28 天,兰索拉唑组有更多的患者对治疗满意或非常满意(87.7%比 59.6%,P=0.0012)。兰索拉唑治疗是治疗反应(定义为总症状评分改善≥50%)的唯一显著预测因素(P<0.0001)。

结论

PPI 单药治疗可显著改善动力障碍样症状,优于 H2RAs 加 Proks,应成为日本 FD 的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of PPIs and H2-receptor antagonists plus prokinetics for dysmotility-like dyspepsia.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr 7;18(13):1517-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i13.1517.
3
Effects of famotidine, mosapride and tandospirone for treatment of functional dyspepsia.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 2:37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02472.x.
4
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub3.
5
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.
10
Randomised clinical trial: rabeprazole improves symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia in Japan.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;38(7):729-40. doi: 10.1111/apt.12444. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined contributions of cytochrome P450s (CYPs) and non-enzymatic metabolism in the in vitro biotransformation of anaprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;396(8):1759-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00210-023-02415-7. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Factors associated with mood disorders and the efficacy of the targeted treatment of functional dyspepsia: A randomized clinical trial.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 22;9:859661. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.859661. eCollection 2022.
4
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub3.
5
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.
6
Disorders of gastrointestinal hypomotility.
F1000Res. 2016 Aug 1;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8658.1. eCollection 2016.
7
Clinical characteristics and effectiveness of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia.
J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;49(4):628-37. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0812-3. Epub 2013 May 8.
8
Current management strategies and emerging treatments for functional dyspepsia.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;10(3):187-94. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.11. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural history of functional dyspepsia: a 10-year population-based study.
Digestion. 2010;81(1):53-61. doi: 10.1159/000243783. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Prevalence of functional dyspepsia in an outpatient clinic with primary care physicians in Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;45(2):187-94. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0168-x. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
3
Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole 20 mg once daily treatment in patients with ulcer-like functional dyspepsia.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jul;24(7):2009-18. doi: 10.1185/03007990802184545. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
4
Functional Dyspepsia: A New Rome III Paradigm.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;10(4):259-72. doi: 10.1007/s11938-007-0069-0.
6
Generation of dyspeptic symptoms by direct acid infusion into the stomach of healthy Japanese subjects.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul 15;26(2):257-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03367.x.
7
Meta-analysis of the effects of prokinetic agents in patients with functional dyspepsia.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;22(3):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04493.x.
8
Functional gastroduodenal disorders.
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1466-79. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.059.
9
Novel mechanisms in functional dyspepsia.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 7;12(5):673-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i5.673.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验