Subasi Gulce, Ozturk Nilgun, Inan Ozgur, Bozogullari Nalan
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, TURKIYE.
Eur J Dent. 2012 Apr;6(2):163-8.
This in-vitro study investigated the marginal fit of two all-ceramic copings with 2 finish line designs.
Forty machined stainless steel molar die models with two different margin designs (chamfer and rounded shoulder) were prepared. A total of 40 standardized copings were fabricated and divided into 4 groups (n=10 for each finish line-coping material). Coping materials tested were IPS e.max Press and Zirkonzahn; luting agent was Variolink II. Marginal fit was evaluated after cementation with a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16). Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey-HSD test were performed to assess the influence of each finish line design and ceramic type on the marginal fit of 2 all-ceramic copings (α =.05).
Two-way analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant differences for marginal fit relative to finish lines (P=.362) and ceramic types (P=.065).
Within the limitations of this study, both types of all-ceramic copings demonstrated that the mean marginal fit was considered acceptable for clinical application (⩽120 μm).
本体外研究调查了两种带有两种肩台设计的全瓷冠边缘适合性。
制备40个具有两种不同边缘设计(直角肩台和圆钝肩台)的加工不锈钢磨牙代型。共制作40个标准化全瓷冠,并分为4组(每种肩台-全瓷冠材料组合n = 10)。测试的全瓷冠材料为IPS e.max Press和Zirkonzahn;粘结剂为Variolink II。粘结后使用体视显微镜(徕卡MZ16)评估边缘适合性。进行双向方差分析和Tukey-HSD检验,以评估每种肩台设计和陶瓷类型对两种全瓷冠边缘适合性的影响(α = 0.05)。
双向方差分析显示,边缘适合性在肩台类型(P = 0.362)和陶瓷类型(P = 0.065)方面无统计学显著差异。
在本研究的局限性内,两种类型的全瓷冠均表明平均边缘适合性在临床应用中被认为是可接受的(≤120μm)。