Suppr超能文献

用于牙体预备的生物导向制备技术(BOPT):系统评价与分析

Biological oriented preparation technique (BOPT) for tooth preparation: A systematic review and -analysis.

作者信息

Al-Haddad Afaf, Arsheed Noor Addeen Abo, Yee Ang, Kohli Shivani

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahsa University, Malaysia.

Division of Restorative Dentistry, International Medical University, Malaysia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jan;36(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review is aimed to evaluate in fixed prosthodontics treated teeth, the effect of the BOPT on periodontal health compared to the horizontal preparation technique using a chamfer finishing line or to the baseline.

METHODS

The electronic databases Cochrane Central Library, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched based on specific MeSH keywords. The Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical trials on BOPT printed in English up to July 2022 were selected. Screening, selection, and data extraction were done. The studies were assessed for risk of bias, and descriptive and meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the systematic review and only three RCTs were involved in the -analysis. Two RCTs were assessed as low risk while one has some concerns. were grouped as good, fair, and poor based on NOS. Three of the prospective studies were considered to be of good quality and one study was fair. The -analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the effect of BOPT and chamfer preparation on periodontal health status and success rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the limitation of this review, the BOPT is comparable to chamfer preparation and it resulted in an acceptable effect to maintain periodontal health with a high success rate. However, more evidence is required to support these findings.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估在固定修复治疗的牙齿中,与使用肩台精修线的水平制备技术或基线相比,BOPT对牙周健康的影响。

方法

基于特定的医学主题词(MeSH)关键词检索电子数据库Cochrane中央图书馆、PubMed、Scopus和ScienceDirect。选取截至2022年7月以英文发表的关于BOPT的随机对照临床试验(RCT)和前瞻性临床试验。进行筛选、选择和数据提取。对研究进行偏倚风险评估,并进行描述性分析和荟萃分析。

结果

系统评价纳入了8项研究,荟萃分析仅涉及3项RCT。2项RCT被评估为低风险,1项存在一些问题。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)分为好、中、差。3项前瞻性研究被认为质量良好,1项研究质量中等。荟萃分析显示,BOPT和肩台制备对牙周健康状况和成功率的影响无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

考虑到本评价的局限性,BOPT与肩台制备相当,在维持牙周健康方面具有可接受的效果且成功率较高。然而,需要更多证据支持这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd88/10874799/e8ac218fa264/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验