Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Christiana Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
The aim of this study was to compare capsule exposure using extracapsular dissection (ECD) with partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) for pleomorphic adenoma.
Long-term favorable results for recurrence and facial nerve function have been reported for ECD and PSP for parotid pleomorphic adenoma. Extracapsular dissection is distinguished from PSP in that the facial nerve is dissected in PSP but not in ECD. This article attempts to answer the following hypothesis: the margin of normal parotid tissue surrounding a parotid pleomorphic adenoma is less for ECD compared with PSP.
This is a retrospective individual case-control study. Twelve consecutive parotidectomy procedures with a final pathology report of pleomorphic adenoma were retrospectively measured for margin (the percent of capsule exposure around the tumor). In 8 highly selected patients, ECD was performed. Four parotid surgical procedures not meeting strict criteria underwent PSP and served as controls.
The eight patients with ECD had a mean of 80% (71%-99%) of the capsule exposed. The 4 PSP procedures had 21% (4%-50%) of the capsule exposed (P < .05).
Extracapsular dissection results in higher capsule exposure.
本研究旨在比较囊外解剖(ECD)与部分腮腺浅叶切除术(PSP)治疗腮腺多形性腺瘤的囊暴露情况。
ECD 和 PSP 治疗腮腺多形性腺瘤均有报道复发和面神经功能长期效果良好。ECD 与 PSP 的区别在于,在 PSP 中面神经被解剖,而在 ECD 中则没有。本文试图回答以下假设:与 PSP 相比,ECD 周围正常腮腺组织的腮腺多形性腺瘤边缘较少。
8 例 ECD 患者的平均囊暴露率为 80%(71%-99%)。4 例不符合严格标准的 PSP 手术的囊暴露率为 21%(4%-50%)(P<.05)。
ECD 可导致更高的囊暴露。