Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Pain Res Manag. 2012 Mar-Apr;17(2):98-102. doi: 10.1155/2012/610561.
Conditioned pain modulation paradigms are often used to assess the diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) system. DNICs provide one of the main supraspinal pain inhibitory pathways and are impaired in several chronic pain populations. Only one previous study has examined the psychometric properties of the conditioned pain modulation technique and this study did not evaluate intersession reliability.
To evaluate and compare the intra- and intersession reliability of two conditioned pain modulation paradigms using different conditioning stimuli, and to determine the time course of conditioned pain inhibition following stimulus removal.
An electronic pressure transducer was used to determine the pressure-pain threshold at the knee during painful conditioning of the opposite hand using the ischemic arm test and the cold pressor test. Assessments were completed twice on one day and repeated once approximately three days later.
The two conditioning stimuli resulted in a similar increase in the pressure-pain threshold at the knee, reflecting presumed activation of the DNIC system. Intrasession intraclass correlation coefficients for the cold pressor (0.85) and ischemic arm tests (0.75) were excellent. The intersession intraclass correlation coefficient for the cold pressor test was good (0.66) but was poor for the ischemic arm test (-0.4). Inhibition of the pressure-pain threshold remained significant at 10 min following conditioning, but returned to baseline by 15 min.
Within-session reliability of DNIC assessment using conditioned pain modulation paradigms was excellent, but the applicability of assessing pain modulation over multiple sessions was influenced by the conditioning stimulus. The cold pressor test was the superior technique.
条件性疼痛调制范式常用于评估弥散性疼痛抑制控制(DNIC)系统。DNICs 提供了主要的脊髓上疼痛抑制途径之一,在几种慢性疼痛人群中受到损害。之前只有一项研究检查了条件性疼痛调制技术的心理测量特性,而这项研究没有评估组间可靠性。
评估和比较两种使用不同条件刺激的条件性疼痛调制范式的组内和组间可靠性,并确定刺激消除后条件性疼痛抑制的时间过程。
使用电子压力换能器在手的对侧进行缺血性手臂测试和冷加压测试的疼痛条件作用下,在膝盖处确定压力疼痛阈值。在一天内完成两次评估,并在大约三天后重复一次。
两种条件刺激都导致膝盖处的压力疼痛阈值相似增加,反映了 DNIC 系统的假定激活。冷加压(0.85)和缺血性手臂测试(0.75)的组内 ICC 为优秀。冷加压测试的组间 ICC 为良好(0.66),但缺血性手臂测试为差(-0.4)。在条件作用后 10 分钟,疼痛阈值的抑制仍然显著,但在 15 分钟时恢复到基线。
使用条件性疼痛调制范式评估 DNIC 的组内可靠性非常好,但在多个疗程中评估疼痛调制的适用性受到条件刺激的影响。冷加压测试是更优的技术。