Blum Severin, Gisler Jana, Dalla Costa Emanuela, Montavon Stéphane, Spadavecchia Claudia
Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy Section, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Veterinary Department of the Swiss Armed Forces, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 24;5:1463688. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1463688. eCollection 2024.
Study objective was to evaluate whether the application of a lip twitch could be proposed as conditioning stimulus in the context of a novel Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) assessment paradigm for use in horses. The study was a prospective, experimental, randomized trial. Twelve healthy horses were evaluated in two experimental sessions. The lip twitch was used as the conditioning stimulus in both sessions; electrical stimulation was used as the test stimulus in one session, while mechanical and thermal stimulations were used in the other. Differences between thresholds recorded before and during twitching (Δ) as well as their percent (%) change were computed for each stimulation modality as a measure of CPM. Heart rate and respiratory rate were recorded throughout the experiments to monitor physiological reactions, while the general level of stress and aversiveness toward twitching were scored using behavioural scales. Based on these scores, interruption criteria were defined. Ten and seven horses completed the electrical and mechanical/thermal experimental sessions respectively. For electrical stimulation, median (IQR) Δ was -2.8 (-3.9, -1.1) mA and% change 87.9 (65.7-118.2)%; for mechanical stimulation, Δ was -18.2 (-6.4, -21.4) N and% change 343.5 (140, 365.3)%; for thermal stimulation, Δ was -3.1 (-9.2, -2.1)°C, while% change was not calculated. Heart rate and respiratory rates varied significantly over time, with higher values recorded during twitching. Median stress and aversion scores did not differ between the two sessions. As lip twitching consistently affected thresholds to all stimulation modalities, it can be proposed as effective conditioning method for CPM assessment in horses. The exclusion of subjects due to severe aversion shows that this paradigm cannot be indistinctively applied to all horses and that stringent interruption criteria are necessary to guarantee adequate welfare during testing.
研究目的是评估在一种用于马匹的新型条件性疼痛调制(CPM)评估范式中,唇部抽搐的应用是否可被提议作为条件刺激。该研究是一项前瞻性、实验性、随机试验。12匹健康马匹在两个实验阶段接受评估。在两个阶段中均使用唇部抽搐作为条件刺激;在一个阶段中使用电刺激作为测试刺激,而在另一个阶段中使用机械和热刺激。计算每种刺激方式在抽搐前和抽搐期间记录的阈值之间的差异(Δ)及其百分比(%)变化,作为CPM的一种测量指标。在整个实验过程中记录心率和呼吸频率,以监测生理反应,同时使用行为量表对压力的总体水平和对抽搐的厌恶程度进行评分。基于这些评分,定义了中断标准。分别有10匹和7匹马完成了电刺激和机械/热刺激实验阶段。对于电刺激,中位数(IQR)Δ为-2.8(-3.9,-1.1)mA,百分比变化为87.9(65.7 - 118.2)%;对于机械刺激,Δ为-18.2(-6.4,-21.4)N,百分比变化为343.5(140,365.3)%;对于热刺激,Δ为-3.1(-9.2,-2.1)°C,而百分比变化未计算。心率和呼吸频率随时间有显著变化,在抽搐期间记录到的值更高。两个阶段的中位数压力和厌恶评分没有差异。由于唇部抽搐持续影响所有刺激方式的阈值,因此可以提议将其作为马匹CPM评估的有效条件方法。由于严重厌恶而排除受试者表明,这种范式不能不加区分地应用于所有马匹,并且需要严格的中断标准来确保测试期间的适当福利。