Suppr超能文献

心脏压塞时血流动力学变化的范围

Spectrum of hemodynamic changes in cardiac tamponade.

作者信息

Reddy P S, Curtiss E I, Uretsky B F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1990 Dec 15;66(20):1487-91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90540-h.

Abstract

To investigate the pathophysiology of cardiac tamponade, the hemodynamics of 77 consecutive patients with greater than 150 ml of pericardial effusion were studied. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the equilibration of intrapericardial with right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures (mm Hg): group I (n = 16), intrapericardial pressure was less than right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures; group II (n = 13), intrapericardial pressure was equilibrated with right atrial but not pulmonary arterial wedge pressures; group III (n = 48), intrapericardial pressure was equilibrated with right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures. Pericardiocentesis produced the following changes: group I--significant (p less than 0.03) decreases in intrapericardial pressure (7 +/- 2 mm Hg), right atrial pressure (3 +/- 2 mm Hg), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (2 +/- 2 mm Hg), and the inspiratory decrease in arterial systolic pressure (3 +/- 4 mm Hg) but no significant change in cardiac output; group II--significant (p less than 0.02) decreases in intrapericardial pressure (11 +/- 5 mm Hg), right atrial pressure (6 +/- 4 mm Hg), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (4 +/- 5 mm Hg), and inspiratory decrease in arterial systolic pressure (8 +/- 7 mm Hg), and increase in cardiac output (1.1 +/- 1.2 liters/min); group III--significant (p less than 0.001) decreases in intrapericardial pressure (16 +/- 7 mm Hg), right atrial pressure (9 +/- 4 mm Hg), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (8 +/- 5 mm Hg), inspiratory decrease in arterial systolic pressure (17 +/- 11 mm Hg), and increase in cardiac output (2.8 +/- 1.5 liters/min). The changes after pericardiocentesis in all parameters were significantly (p less than 0.05) greater in group III than in groups I or II except for the change in right atrial pressure, which was not significantly different in groups II versus III. The changes after pericardiocentesis indicate pericardial effusion caused the greatest abnormalities in group III but also caused significant abnormalities of pressure and flow in group II and of pressure alone in group I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为研究心脏压塞的病理生理学,对77例心包积液超过150 ml的连续患者的血流动力学进行了研究。根据心包内压力与右心房压力及肺动脉楔压(mmHg)的平衡情况,将患者分为3组:I组(n = 16),心包内压力低于右心房压力及肺动脉楔压;II组(n = 13),心包内压力与右心房压力平衡,但与肺动脉楔压不平衡;III组(n = 48),心包内压力与右心房压力及肺动脉楔压均平衡。心包穿刺产生了以下变化:I组——心包内压力(7±2 mmHg)、右心房压力(3±2 mmHg)、肺动脉楔压(2±2 mmHg)及动脉收缩压吸气相下降幅度(3±4 mmHg)显著(p<0.03)降低,但心输出量无显著变化;II组——心包内压力(11±5 mmHg)、右心房压力(6±4 mmHg)、肺动脉楔压(4±5 mmHg)及动脉收缩压吸气相下降幅度(8±7 mmHg)显著(p<0.02)降低,心输出量增加(1.1±1.2升/分钟);III组——心包内压力(16±7 mmHg)、右心房压力(9±4 mmHg)、肺动脉楔压(8±5 mmHg)、动脉收缩压吸气相下降幅度(17±11 mmHg)显著(p<0.001)降低,心输出量增加(2.8±1.5升/分钟)。除右心房压力变化在II组与III组间无显著差异外,心包穿刺后III组所有参数的变化均显著(p<0.05)大于I组或II组。心包穿刺后的变化表明,心包积液在III组引起的异常最严重,但在II组也引起了显著的压力和血流异常,而在I组仅引起压力异常。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验