Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, USA.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012 Jun;24(3):400-6. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835333e3.
We review recommendations from recent publications on the management of fever with antipyretics, the classification and diagnosis of fevers of unknown origin (FUO), and the evaluation of fever in infants under 90 days of age.
Anxiety about fever persists in the population, while the toxicity of antipyretics is an increasing concern. The numerous opportunities for overdosing with antipyretics have been emphasized by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The practice of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen has limited value. Nonclassic FUO and pseudo-FUO are as important to consider as true FUO, and clinicians should become familiar with the variety of periodic fever syndromes. The clinical utility of low-risk criteria to identify febrile infants at low risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) was demonstrated in a systematic review of studies.
Pediatricians should spend more time educating parents about fever and antipyretic use. Not all persistent fever is FUO, and testing should be targeted to the child's clinical condition. Existing low-risk criteria should be used to identify febrile infants who can be managed without extensive work-up and antibiotics. Adherence to evidence-based recommendations will lessen the morbidity and mortality associated with febrile illnesses in children.
本文回顾了近期关于解热剂退热管理、不明原因发热(FUO)的分类和诊断以及 90 天以下婴儿发热评估的建议。
人群中对发热的焦虑仍然存在,而退热剂的毒性则越来越令人担忧。美国儿科学会(AAP)强调了过量使用退热剂的诸多机会。交替使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的做法价值有限。非典型 FUO 和假性 FUO 与真正的 FUO 同样重要,临床医生应熟悉各种周期性发热综合征。一项针对研究的系统评价证明,使用低危标准来识别发热婴儿中发生严重细菌感染(SBI)风险低的患者具有临床实用性。
儿科医生应花更多时间教育家长有关发热和退热剂使用的知识。并非所有持续发热都是 FUO,应根据患儿的临床情况进行检测。应使用现有的低危标准来识别发热婴儿,以便无需进行广泛检查和使用抗生素即可进行管理。遵循基于证据的建议将降低儿童发热性疾病的发病率和死亡率。