Special Education Program, Constantiner School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel.
J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Oct;41(10):1294-311. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9767-6. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
Investigation of the role of adolescents' patterns of close relationships with significant adults may be of particular interest in populations with learning disabilities ("LD") during adolescence, because attachment relationship variables may act as risk or protective factors during this developmental period when trajectories are set that can lead to difficulties in adulthood. Specifically, this study examined a model of protective factors comprising patterns of close relationships between adolescents (n=369; 53 % female; aged 15-17) and significant adults (mother, father, homeroom teacher) for explaining adolescents' socioemotional and behavioral adjustment, comparing adolescents with and without LD. The current assessment of adolescents' socioemotional adjustment included both internalizing aspects (loneliness, affect, and internalizing behavior syndrome) and externalizing aspects (externalizing behavior syndrome). On most measures, significant group differences emerged between adolescents with LD (n=181) and adolescents with typical development (n=188). SEM analysis found high fit between the theoretical model and empirical findings. Both groups showed similar paths between adolescent-mother attachment and adolescent adjustment, whereas significant group differences emerged for the contribution of adolescents' close relationships with fathers and teachers to adolescents' adjustment. The discussion focuses on the possible unique value of close relationships with each attachment figure at home and at school for adolescents with LD versus typical development.
研究青少年与重要成年人亲密关系模式的作用,对于青少年学习障碍(“LD”)人群可能特别有意义,因为在这个发展时期,依恋关系变量可能是风险或保护因素,这些轨迹可能导致成年后出现困难。具体来说,本研究通过考察保护因素模式,来解释青少年(n=369;53%为女性;年龄为 15-17 岁)与重要成年人(母亲、父亲、班主任)之间的亲密关系,来解释青少年的社会情感和行为适应情况,比较有 LD 和无 LD 的青少年。目前对青少年社会情感适应的评估包括内化方面(孤独感、情感和内化行为综合征)和外化方面(外化行为综合征)。在大多数测量指标上,LD 青少年(n=181)和典型发展青少年(n=188)之间存在显著的群体差异。结构方程模型分析发现,理论模型与实证发现之间具有高度拟合。两个群体在青少年与母亲的依恋关系与青少年适应之间表现出相似的路径,而青少年与父亲和教师的亲密关系对青少年适应的贡献则存在显著的群体差异。讨论重点关注了对于 LD 青少年和典型发展青少年而言,与每个依恋对象的亲密关系在家中和学校中可能具有独特的价值。