Chemical & Environmental Engineering Department, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 Sep;19(8):3450-60. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0877-1. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
When fossil fuels on the Earth are used up, which kind of green energy can be used to replace them? Do every bioenergy generation or crop food chain results in environmental pollution? These questions are major concerns in a world facing restricted supplies of energy and food as well as environmental pollutions. To alleviate these issues, option biogases are explored in this paper.
Two types of biogas generators were used for modifying the traditional crop food chain [viz. from atmospheric CO(2) photosynthesis to crops, crop stem/husk biowastes (burnt in cropland or as home fuels), to livestock droppings (dumping away), pork and people foods, then to CO(2)], via turning the biowaste pollutants into green bioenergies. By analyzing the traditional food chain via observation method, the drawbacks of by-product biowastes were revealed. Also, the whole cycle chain was further analyzed to assess its "greenness," using experimental data and other information, such as the material balance (e.g., the absorbed CO(2), investment versus generated food, energy, and wastes).
The data show that by using the two types of biogas generators, clean renewable bioenergy, crop food, and livestock meat could be continuously produced without creating any waste to the world. The modification chain largely reduced CO(2) greenhouse gas and had a low-cost investment. The raw materials for the gas generators were only the wastes of crop stems and livestock droppings. Thus, the recommended CO(2) bioenergy cycle chain via the modification also greatly solved the environmental biowaste pollutions in the world.
The described two type biogases effectively addressed the issues on energy, food, and environmental pollution. The green renewable bioenergy from the food cycle chain may be one of suitable alternatives to fossil and tree fuels for agricultural countries.
地球上的化石燃料用完后,哪种绿色能源可以替代它们?每一种生物能源的产生或作物食物链都会导致环境污染吗?这些问题是能源和粮食供应有限以及环境污染的世界所面临的主要问题。为了缓解这些问题,本文探讨了可选的沼气。
使用两种类型的沼气发生器来修改传统的作物食物链[即从大气 CO(2)光合作用到作物、作物茎/壳生物废物(在农田中燃烧或作为家庭燃料)、牲畜粪便(倾倒)、猪肉和人类食物,然后到 CO(2)],通过将生物废物污染物转化为绿色生物能源。通过观察法分析传统食物链,揭示了副产品生物废物的缺点。此外,还进一步分析了整个循环链,使用实验数据和其他信息(例如物质平衡,例如吸收的 CO(2)、投资与生成的食物、能源和废物)来评估其“绿色”程度。
数据表明,使用两种类型的沼气发生器,可以在不向世界产生任何废物的情况下,持续生产清洁可再生的生物能源、作物食品和牲畜肉类。修改后的链条大大减少了 CO(2)温室气体,投资成本低。气体发生器的原材料仅为作物茎和牲畜粪便的废物。因此,推荐的通过修改的 CO(2)生物能源循环链也大大解决了世界环境生物废物污染问题。
描述的两种类型的沼气有效地解决了能源、粮食和环境污染问题。来自食物链循环的绿色可再生生物能源可能是农业国家替代化石和树木燃料的合适替代品之一。