Suppr超能文献

在加拿大一家三级护理中心,常规检测粪便中的卵和寄生虫并无用处。

Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre.

机构信息

London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Microbiol. 2012 May;58(5):653-9. doi: 10.1139/w2012-039. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many clinical situations, stool examinations for ova and parasites (O&P) are routine in the work-up of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea. Frequently, these tests are found to be negative for pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic yield of routine stool testing for O&P in a Canadian tertiary care centre and to estimate the potential clinical benefit of a positive result.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All stool samples sent to the central microbiology laboratory at London Health Sciences Centre were reviewed over a 5-year period ending January 2010. Initial screening was done by direct antigen testing using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique followed by direct microscopy for negative results where there was a high index of suspicion and for positive results to rule out any concurrent parasites not included in the EIA kit. Pathogens identified were categorized and their potential susceptibility to metronidazole was estimated. No clinical data were available, as this was purely a utilization study.

RESULTS

A total of 5812 stool tests were ordered. Of these, 5681 (97.7%) were completed. The most common reasons for an incomplete test were sample leakage (n = 38) and use of the incorrect collection kit (n = 32). Direct microscopy identified white blood cells in 17% of patients with positive testing. The most common pathogen was Giardia lamblia , which was detected in 45/83 (54%) of positive specimens. Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar was identified in 16/83 (19%) and Cryptosporidium spp. in 10/83 (12%) of positive specimens. Microorganisms not thought to be pathogenic were identified in 7/83 (8%). Direct laboratory costs independent of labor were estimated at $1836 per clinically significant organism identified. Of the 77 specimens positive for pathogenic organisms, 62 (81%) were likely to be sensitive to treatment with metronidazole.

CONCLUSION

In a tertiary care centre, the diagnostic yield of routine testing of stool for O&P during the evaluation of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea is low. Most clinically significant positive results should be responsive to metronidazole, but empirical treatment is not encouraged. Strategies to identify patients with a higher likelihood of harboring pathogenic parasites and consideration of empiric metronidazole therapy for patients at highest risk merit further research.

摘要

背景

在许多临床情况下,对急性或慢性腹泻患者进行检查时,粪便检查卵和寄生虫(O&P)通常是常规检查。这些测试通常发现没有病原体。本研究的目的是检查加拿大三级保健中心常规粪便 O&P 检测的诊断效果,并估计阳性结果的潜在临床益处。

患者和方法

回顾了 2010 年 1 月结束的 5 年期间送到伦敦健康科学中心中央微生物实验室的所有粪便样本。初始筛选是使用酶免疫测定(EIA)技术进行直接抗原检测,然后对高度怀疑有阴性结果的样本进行直接显微镜检查,对阳性结果进行检查以排除 EIA 试剂盒中未包括的任何并存寄生虫。鉴定出的病原体进行分类,并估计其对甲硝唑的潜在敏感性。由于这纯粹是一项利用研究,因此没有临床数据。

结果

共进行了 5812 次粪便检测,其中 5681 次(97.7%)完成。未完成检测的最常见原因是样本泄漏(n = 38)和使用不正确的收集试剂盒(n = 32)。直接显微镜检查发现,17%的阳性检测患者的白细胞。最常见的病原体是蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫,在 83 份阳性标本中检出 45 份(54%)。在 83 份阳性标本中鉴定出溶组织内阿米巴/迪斯帕内阿米巴 16 份(19%)和隐孢子虫属 10 份(12%)。在 83 份阳性标本中鉴定出被认为非致病性的微生物 7 份(8%)。独立于劳动力的直接实验室成本估计为每鉴定出一个具有临床意义的生物体 1836 美元。在 77 份阳性的致病性生物体标本中,62 份(81%)可能对甲硝唑治疗敏感。

结论

在三级保健中心,对急性或慢性腹泻患者进行粪便 O&P 常规检测的诊断效果较低。大多数具有临床意义的阳性结果应对甲硝唑敏感,但不鼓励经验性治疗。进一步研究确定更有可能携带致病性寄生虫的患者的策略,并考虑对风险最高的患者进行经验性甲硝唑治疗,值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验