Suppr超能文献

子宫冲洗或抽吸:哪种宫内环境视角?

Uterine lavage or aspirate: which view of the intrauterine environment?

机构信息

Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2012 Oct;19(10):1125-32. doi: 10.1177/1933719112443879. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Abstract

Fluid within the uterine cavity provides the microenvironment for preimplantation blastocyst development and early implantation. Analysis of uterine fluid sampled by aspiration or lavage provides a view of this microenvironment but the similarity or otherwise of the sample components is not known. This study compared proteins in aspirates versus lavage samples taken sequentially from the same women, using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS), multiplex cytokine assays, and an activity assay for proprotein convertase 6. Both lavage and aspiration enabled analysis of uterine fluid components, but they provided substantially different protein profiles. Although there were many similarities in overall protein profiles and most specific proteins examined were detected in both fluids, these were neither qualitatively nor quantitatively comparable within each participant. A likely explanation is that lavage samples the entire uterine cavity including washing the endometrial surface (glycocalyx), whereas aspiration sampling is very local.

摘要

宫腔内的液体为着床前囊胚发育和早期着床提供了微环境。通过抽吸或灌洗采集的宫腔液分析可以观察到这种微环境,但样本成分的相似性尚不清楚。本研究使用表面增强激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(SELDI-TOF-MS)、多重细胞因子检测和前蛋白转化酶 6 活性检测,比较了来自同一女性的顺序抽吸和灌洗样本中的蛋白质。灌洗和抽吸均可分析宫腔液成分,但提供的蛋白质谱有很大差异。尽管两种方法的总蛋白质谱有许多相似之处,并且大多数检查的特定蛋白质都在两种液体中被检测到,但在每个参与者中,它们既没有定性也没有定量可比。一种可能的解释是,灌洗样本包括整个子宫腔,包括冲洗子宫内膜表面(糖萼),而抽吸采样则非常局部。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验