Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍检查表在非临床的战斗暴露国民警卫队样本中的预测效度。

The predictive validity of the PTSD Checklist in a nonclinical sample of combat-exposed National Guard troops.

机构信息

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):1034-40. doi: 10.1037/a0028014. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

Abstract

After returning from an extended combat deployment to Iraq, 348 National Guard soldiers were administered the PTSD Checklist (PCL-M), and the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) followed, on average, 3 months later by structured diagnostic interviews including the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). There were 6.5% of the soldiers who met diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on structured interview. The predictive validity of the PCL was examined and contrasted with the predictive validity of the BDI-II in identifying soldiers meeting CAPS diagnosis for PTSD. The best identified PCL cut scores produced between 65% and 76% false positive errors when used as the sole source for identification of enduring PTSD. Comparison of prediction between the PCL and the BDI-II in identifying PTSD suggested that both instruments may be operating through tapping generalized distress rather than specific aspects of the disorder.

摘要

从伊拉克的一次长期战斗部署返回后,348 名国民警卫队士兵接受了创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-M)的检查,平均 3 个月后接受了包括临床医生管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS)在内的结构化诊断访谈,用于精神障碍诊断和统计手册(第 4 版)。根据结构化访谈,有 6.5%的士兵符合创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准。检查了 PCL 的预测有效性,并将其与 BDI-II 在识别符合 CAPS PTSD 诊断的士兵方面的预测有效性进行了对比。当仅使用 PCL 作为确定持续性 PTSD 的唯一来源时,最佳的 PCL 截断分数产生了 65%至 76%的假阳性错误。在识别 PTSD 方面,PCL 和 BDI-II 的预测比较表明,这两种工具可能都通过挖掘一般痛苦而不是疾病的特定方面来运作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验