Soto Mesa D, Del Valle Ruiz V, Fayad Fayad M, Cosío Carreño F, Blanco Rodríguez I, González Castaño R, Bermejo Alvárez M A
Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Apr;59(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
To compare the efficacy of a multimodal analgesia with 2 different techniques (femoral nerve block with a single dose and continuous femoral nerve block) in the control of pain, use of opioids, and secondary effects in patients subjected to total knee replacement.
A prospective randomised study of patients subjected to knee replacement with subarachnoid anaesthesia. The postoperative analgesia consisted of tramadol, dexketoprofen and paracetamol, and one of the following techniques: Femoral nerve block with a single dose of 30mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, or that dose plus a continuous infusion via a femoral catheter of 0.375% ropivacaine 6ml/h for 48h. The demographic, anaesthetic and surgical variables were recorded, along with the pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, opioid use, and complications at 24 and 48h after surgery.
A total of 104 patients were included. There no differences in the demographic data between the groups. The pain intensity was lower in the group that had continuous femoral block, particularly at 48h, compared to the single-dose block, and with a lower use of rescue analgesia in the continuous femoral block. The incidence in secondary effects was similar, with a lower long-term sensory block being observed in the femoral block with a single dose.
The use of peripheral nerve block is accepted practice for analgesia after knee replacement surgery. Continuous femoral block is a valid alternative, decreasing the use of rescue opiates and pain intensity (particularly at 48h) compared to isolated femoral block.
比较两种不同技术(单次剂量股神经阻滞和连续股神经阻滞)的多模式镇痛在全膝关节置换患者疼痛控制、阿片类药物使用及副作用方面的疗效。
一项对接受蛛网膜下腔麻醉的膝关节置换患者的前瞻性随机研究。术后镇痛包括曲马多、右酮洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚,以及以下技术之一:单次注射30mL 0.5%罗哌卡因进行股神经阻滞,或该剂量加通过股动脉导管以6ml/h的速度持续输注0.375%罗哌卡因48小时。记录人口统计学、麻醉和手术变量,以及术后24小时和48小时使用视觉模拟量表评估的疼痛强度、阿片类药物使用情况和并发症。
共纳入104例患者。两组间人口统计学数据无差异。与单次剂量阻滞组相比,连续股神经阻滞组的疼痛强度较低,尤其是在48小时时,且连续股神经阻滞组的补救镇痛药物使用较少。副作用发生率相似,单次剂量股神经阻滞的长期感觉阻滞较低。
周围神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛是公认的做法。与单次股神经阻滞相比,连续股神经阻滞是一种有效的替代方法,可减少补救性阿片类药物的使用和疼痛强度(尤其是在48小时时)。