Suppr超能文献

早期术后假体周围感染的灌洗和清创失败。

Failure of irrigation and débridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection.

机构信息

OrthoCarolina, PA, Hip and Knee Center, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 200-A, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):250-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2373-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irrigation and débridement (I&D) of periprosthetic infection (PPI) is associated with infection control ranging from 16% to 47%. Mitigating factors include organism type, host factors, and timing of intervention. While the influence of organism type and host factors has been clarified, the timing of intervention remains unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We addressed the following questions: What is the failure rate of I&Ds performed within 90 days of primary surgery? And what factors are associated with failure?

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of I&D for PPI within 90 days of primary surgery. We included 86 patients (44 males, 42 females) with an average age of 61 years. Failure was defined as return to the operating room for an infection-related problem. We determined the failure rate of I&D within 90 days of primary surgery and whether the odds of rerevision for infection were associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, sex, joint, organism type, and timing. The minimum followup was 24 months (average, 46 months; range, 24-106 months).

RESULTS

54 of 86 patients (63%) failed. Eight of 10 (80%) failed within the first 10 days, 32 of 57 (56%) within 4 weeks, and 22 of 29 (76%) within 31 to 90 days postoperatively. No covariates were associated with subsequent revision surgery for infection.

CONCLUSIONS

I&D for PPI is frequently used in the early postoperative period to control infection. While it is assumed early intervention will lead to control of infection in most cases, our data contradict this assumption.

摘要

背景

关节置换术后感染(PPI)的灌洗和清创术(I&D)与抗感染的成功率范围在 16%到 47%之间。降低感染的因素包括病原体类型、宿主因素和干预时机。虽然病原体类型和宿主因素的影响已经阐明,但干预时机仍不清楚。

问题/目的:我们提出了以下问题:在初次手术后 90 天内进行 I&D 的失败率是多少?哪些因素与失败有关?

方法

我们对初次手术后 90 天内进行的 PPI 的 I&D 进行了多中心回顾性分析。我们纳入了 86 名患者(44 名男性,42 名女性),平均年龄为 61 岁。失败定义为因感染相关问题返回手术室。我们确定了初次手术后 90 天内 I&D 的失败率,以及感染再次翻修的可能性是否与 Charlson 合并症指数、年龄、性别、关节、病原体类型和时机有关。最低随访时间为 24 个月(平均 46 个月;范围 24-106 个月)。

结果

86 名患者中有 54 名(63%)失败。10 名患者中有 8 名(80%)在术后 10 天内失败,57 名患者中有 32 名(56%)在 4 周内失败,29 名患者中有 22 名(76%)在术后 31 至 90 天内失败。没有协变量与随后因感染行翻修手术有关。

结论

PPI 的 I&D 常在术后早期用于控制感染。虽然人们认为早期干预将在大多数情况下控制感染,但我们的数据与这一假设相矛盾。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Cementless revision for infected total hip replacements.感染性全髋关节置换的非骨水泥翻修术
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):19-26. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25120.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验