• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非特异性胸痛入院的费用负担。

Cost burden of non-specific chest pain admissions.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Waterford Regional Hospital, Waterford, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Mar;182(1):57-61. doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0826-5. Epub 2012 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-012-0826-5
PMID:22552895
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-cardiac aetiologies are common among patients presenting with chest pain.

AIM

To determine the cost of non-specific chest pain admissions to a tertiary referral, teaching hospital.

METHODS

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk (TIMI) risk score, lengths of stay (LOS), investigations and diagnoses were recorded for patients admitted with chest pain. Non-specific chest pain was defined as chest pain where cardiac, pulmonary and gastroesophageal aetiologies were excluded. Costs of admissions were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 80 patients, 34 (4%) and 22 (28%) were diagnosed with non-specific chest pain and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. Non-specific chest pain admissions had a mean age of 54 (11; 35-74) years, LOS of 3.8 (2.6; 1-11) days and TIMI risk score of 1.4 (1.5; 0-5). Acute coronary syndrome admissions had a mean age of 67 (14; 43-94) years, LOS of 7.7 (4.3; 2-16) days and TIMI risk score of 3.1 (1.2; 0-5). The mean cost per non-specific chest pain admission was €3,729 (2,378; 1,034-10,468), or 48% of the mean cost per acute coronary syndrome admission of €7,667 (4,279; 1,963-16,071). Bed day costs account for >90% of overall costs. Only 7% of patients were weekend discharges. The mean interval to exercise stress test was 2.7(1.5; 1-7) days.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean costs of admission and LOS for patients with non-specific chest pain are significant. Extrapolating findings, annual national cost is estimated at approximately €71 million for this cohort, with 73,000 bed days consumed nationally. Delays from admission to tests and low percentage of weekend discharges prolong LOS.

摘要

背景

非心脏病因在以胸痛为主诉的患者中很常见。

目的

确定三级转诊、教学医院中以胸痛为主诉的非特异性胸痛患者的住院费用。

方法

记录因胸痛入院患者的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分(TIMI)评分、住院时间(LOS)、检查和诊断。非特异性胸痛定义为排除了心脏、肺部和胃食管病因的胸痛。计算入院费用。

结果

80 例患者中,34 例(4%)和 22 例(28%)分别被诊断为非特异性胸痛和急性冠脉综合征。非特异性胸痛患者的平均年龄为 54(11;35-74)岁,LOS 为 3.8(2.6;1-11)天,TIMI 风险评分为 1.4(1.5;0-5)。急性冠脉综合征患者的平均年龄为 67(14;43-94)岁,LOS 为 7.7(4.3;2-16)天,TIMI 风险评分为 3.1(1.2;0-5)。非特异性胸痛患者的平均住院费用为 3729 欧元(2378 欧元;1034-10468 欧元),占急性冠脉综合征患者平均住院费用 7667 欧元(4279 欧元;1963-16071 欧元)的 48%。床位日费用占总费用的 90%以上。只有 7%的患者在周末出院。运动应激试验的平均时间间隔为 2.7(1.5;1-7)天。

结论

非特异性胸痛患者的住院费用和 LOS 均值较高。推断发现,该队列的全国年费用约为 7100 万欧元,全国消耗床位日数为 73000 个。从入院到检查的时间延迟以及周末出院率低延长了 LOS。

相似文献

1
Cost burden of non-specific chest pain admissions.非特异性胸痛入院的费用负担。
Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Mar;182(1):57-61. doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0826-5. Epub 2012 May 3.
2
Chest pain unit using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score risk stratification: an impact on the length of stay and cost savings.胸痛单元使用心肌梗死溶栓评分进行风险分层:对住院时间和成本节约的影响。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Dec;11(4):206-10. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31826cc254.
3
Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with observation unit care reduces cost for patients with emergent chest pain: a randomized trial.应激性心脏磁共振成像与观察单元护理可降低急诊胸痛患者的成本:一项随机试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;56(3):209-219.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 31.
4
Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial.急诊科胸痛患者加速诊断方案与住院治疗的成本:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 1997 Nov 26;278(20):1670-6.
5
The financial burden of emergency department congestion and hospital crowding for chest pain patients awaiting admission.急诊科拥堵和医院拥挤给等待入院的胸痛患者带来的经济负担。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.010.
6
An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: results from a randomized trial.对胸痛但心电图无诊断意义的急诊科患者采用单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像和早期运动负荷试验的积极诊断策略的经济学分析:一项随机试验的结果
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;35(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70100-4.
7
Novel Emergency Department Risk Score Discriminates Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Chest Pain Patients With Known Coronary Artery Disease.新型急诊科风险评分可鉴别已知冠状动脉疾病的胸痛患者中的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Dec;15(4):138-144. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000091.
8
Out-of-hours exercise treadmill testing reduces length of hospital stay for chest pain admissions.非工作时间运动平板试验可缩短胸痛入院患者的住院时间。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Sep;17(9):659-64. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000107.
9
Implementing change: evaluating the Accelerated Chest pain Risk Evaluation (ACRE) project.实施变革:评估加速胸痛风险评估(ACRE)项目。
Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 4;207(5):201-205. doi: 10.5694/mja16.01479.
10
[Chest pain in the emergency department: benefits of a management model modified from the ANMCO-SIMEU recommendations].[急诊科胸痛:基于意大利心脏病学协会-急诊医学和紧急护理学会(ANMCO-SIMEU)建议改进的管理模式的益处]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2011 May;12(5):365-73. doi: 10.1714/643.7502.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedentary Behavior and Cardiac Events and Mortality After Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms: A Prospective Study.急性冠状动脉综合征症状住院后久坐行为与心脏事件及死亡率:一项前瞻性研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun;18(6):e011644. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011644. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
The Impact of an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Using Conventional Troponin I for Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.急诊科使用传统肌钙蛋白I的加速诊断方案对胸痛患者的影响。
CJC Open. 2024 Mar 22;6(7):915-924. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.03.008. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of chest pain assessment to prevent emergency admissions: ESCAPE cluster randomised trial.胸痛评估预防急诊入院的有效性和安全性:ESCAPE 整群随机试验
BMJ. 2007 Sep 29;335(7621):659. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39325.624109.AE. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
2
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
3
How to improve the management of chest pain: hospitalists and use of prediction rules.如何改善胸痛管理:住院医师与预测规则的应用
Evaluating the performance of the HEART score in a Tanzanian emergency department.
评估 HEART 评分在坦桑尼亚急诊科的表现。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;31(4):361-370. doi: 10.1111/acem.14872. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
The Effect of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Psychoeducation Only on Psychological Distress in Patients With Noncardiac Chest Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.互联网提供的认知行为疗法与仅提供心理教育对非心因性胸痛患者心理困扰的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e31674. doi: 10.2196/31674.
5
HEART, TIMI, and GRACE Scores for Prediction of 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in the Era of High-Sensitivity Troponin.高敏肌钙蛋白时代下,心脏 TIMI 和 GRACE 评分对 30 天主要不良心血管事件的预测价值。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Mar 13;114(5):795-802. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190206.
6
Prevalence and outcome of patients referred for chest pain with high-sensitivity troponin elevation and no diagnosis at discharge.因胸痛转诊且高敏肌钙蛋白升高但出院时未确诊患者的患病率及转归
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):953-958. doi: 10.1002/clc.22984. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
7
The effectiveness of emergency nurse practitioner service in the management of patients presenting to rural hospitals with chest pain: a multisite prospective longitudinal nested cohort study.急诊护士执业服务在农村医院胸痛患者管理中的有效性:一项多中心前瞻性纵向嵌套队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2395-9.
8
Guided Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with non-cardiac chest pain - a pilot randomized controlled study.非心源性胸痛患者的指导性互联网认知行为疗法——一项试点随机对照研究。
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1491-1.
9
Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain.整脊疗法与自我管理对肌肉骨骼性胸痛患者的成本效益分析
Open Heart. 2016 May 4;3(1):e000334. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000334. eCollection 2016.
10
A Review of Esophageal Chest Pain.食管性胸痛综述
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015 Nov;11(11):759-66.
South Med J. 2007 Mar;100(3):242-7. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31802f7f94.
4
Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study.急诊科胸痛患者的直接住院费用:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2006 May 4;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-6-6.
5
Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units.急诊科胸痛单元中对患者进行定量预检概率评估以排除急性冠状动脉综合征的前瞻性多中心研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):447. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.013. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
6
The health care burden of acute chest pain.急性胸痛的医疗负担。
Heart. 2005 Feb;91(2):229-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027599.
7
Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care.胸痛观察单元与常规护理的随机对照试验及经济学评估
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37956.664236.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 14.
8
Impact of stress testing on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes for low-risk patients with chest pain admitted to floor telemetry beds.压力测试对入住普通遥测病床的低风险胸痛患者30天心血管结局的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;21(4):282-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(03)00080-9.
9
Critical pathways for patients with acute chest pain at low risk.低风险急性胸痛患者的关键路径
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2002 Apr;13(2):89-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1016246814235.
10
Do subspecialists working outside of their specialty provide less efficient and lower-quality care to hospitalized patients than do primary care physicians?与初级保健医生相比,非专科领域的专科医生为住院患者提供的护理效率更低、质量更差吗?
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Mar 11;162(5):527-32. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.5.527.