Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
J Neurosci. 2012 May 2;32(18):6105-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6136-11.2012.
Evolutionary hypotheses regarding the origins of communication signals generally suggest, particularly for the case of primate orofacial signals, that they derive by ritualization of noncommunicative behaviors, notably including ingestive behaviors such as chewing and nursing. These theories are appealing in part because of the prominent periodicities in both types of behavior. Despite their intuitive appeal, however, there are little or no data with which to evaluate these theories because the coordination of muscles innervated by the facial nucleus has not been carefully compared between communicative and ingestive movements. Such data are especially crucial for reconciling neurophysiological assumptions regarding facial motor control in communication and ingestion. We here address this gap by contrasting the coordination of facial muscles during different types of rhythmic orofacial behavior in macaque monkeys, finding that the perioral muscles innervated by the facial nucleus are rhythmically coordinated during lipsmacks and that this coordination appears distinct from that observed during ingestion.
关于通讯信号起源的进化假说通常表明,特别是对于灵长类动物的口面部信号,它们是通过非通讯行为的仪式化产生的,特别是包括咀嚼和哺乳等摄取行为。这些理论之所以吸引人,部分原因是这两种行为都具有明显的周期性。然而,尽管这些理论具有直观的吸引力,但由于面部核支配的肌肉之间的协调性在通讯和摄取运动之间没有被仔细比较,因此几乎没有或没有数据可以评估这些理论。这些数据对于协调关于通讯和摄取中面部运动控制的神经生理学假设尤为重要。我们通过对比猕猴在不同类型的节律性口面部行为中面部肌肉的协调性来解决这一差距,发现面部核支配的口周肌肉在嘴唇敲击时是有节奏地协调的,这种协调与在摄取期间观察到的协调明显不同。