Brincat Scott L, Miller Earl K
1] The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Apr;18(4):576-81. doi: 10.1038/nn.3954. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
Much of our knowledge of the world depends on learning associations (for example, face-name), for which the hippocampus (HPC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) are critical. HPC-PFC interactions have rarely been studied in monkeys, whose cognitive and mnemonic abilities are akin to those of humans. We found functional differences and frequency-specific interactions between HPC and PFC of monkeys learning object pair associations, an animal model of human explicit memory. PFC spiking activity reflected learning in parallel with behavioral performance, whereas HPC neurons reflected feedback about whether trial-and-error guesses were correct or incorrect. Theta-band HPC-PFC synchrony was stronger after errors, was driven primarily by PFC to HPC directional influences and decreased with learning. In contrast, alpha/beta-band synchrony was stronger after correct trials, was driven more by HPC and increased with learning. Rapid object associative learning may occur in PFC, whereas HPC may guide neocortical plasticity by signaling success or failure via oscillatory synchrony in different frequency bands.
我们对世界的许多认识都依赖于学习关联(例如,面孔与名字),而海马体(HPC)和前额叶皮质(PFC)对此至关重要。HPC与PFC之间的相互作用在猴子身上很少被研究,而猴子的认知和记忆能力与人类相似。我们在学习物体对关联的猴子的HPC和PFC之间发现了功能差异和频率特异性相互作用,这是人类显性记忆的一种动物模型。PFC的尖峰活动与行为表现并行反映学习情况,而HPC神经元反映关于试错猜测正确与否的反馈。错误后theta波段的HPC - PFC同步性更强,主要由PFC对HPC的定向影响驱动,并随着学习而降低。相比之下,正确试验后alpha/β波段的同步性更强,更多地由HPC驱动,并随着学习而增加。快速的物体联想学习可能发生在PFC中,而HPC可能通过在不同频段的振荡同步来信号成功或失败,从而指导新皮质可塑性。