Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):423-7. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/ags048. Epub 2012 May 2.
To examine the feasibility and acceptability of alcohol screening and delivery of brief interventions within criminal justice settings.
A quantitative survey of those aged 18 or over in English criminal justice settings (three custody suites within police stations, three prisons and three probation offices).
The Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST) and a modified version of the Single Alcohol Screening Question (M-SASQ) were compared with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as the 'gold standard'. Participants completed a health status questionnaire (EQ5D), questions on service utilization and the Readiness to Change Questionnaire. Questions relating to the acceptability and feasibility of delivering brief interventions and about perception of coercion were included.
Five hundred and ninety-two individuals were approached and 251 were eligible. Of these, 205 (82%) consented to take part in the study. The mean AUDIT score was 19.9 (SD 13.5) and 73% scored 8 or more on AUDIT. A higher percentage of those approached in the probation setting consented to take part (81%: prison 36%, police setting 10%). Those scoring AUDIT positive were more likely to be involved in violent offences (36.5 vs 9.4%; P < 0.001) and less likely to be involved in offences involving property (27.7 vs 45.3%; P = 0.03). Three quarters of the sample (74%) reported that they would not feel coerced to engage in an intervention about their alcohol use. FAST and M-SASQ had acceptable screening properties when compared with AUDIT with area under the curves of 0.97 and 0.92, respectively.
The results confirm that there is a major problem with alcohol use in the criminal justice system and this impacts on health and criminal behaviour. Of the three criminal justice settings, probation was found to be the most suitable for screening. Participants were positive about receiving interventions for their alcohol use in probation settings.
研究在刑事司法环境中进行酒精筛查和提供简短干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
对年龄在 18 岁及以上的英国刑事司法环境中的人群(警察局的三个拘留室、三个监狱和三个缓刑办公室)进行了一项定量调查。
使用快速酒精筛查测试(FAST)和改良后的单一酒精筛查问题(M-SASQ)与酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)进行比较,作为“金标准”。参与者完成了健康状况问卷(EQ5D)、服务利用情况问题和改变准备程度问卷。还包括了关于提供简短干预措施的可接受性和可行性的问题,以及对强制感的看法。
共接触了 592 人,其中 251 人符合条件。在这些人中,有 205 人(82%)同意参与研究。AUDIT 的平均得分为 19.9(SD 13.5),有 73%的人 AUDIT 得分为 8 分或以上。在缓刑环境中被接触的人同意参与的比例更高(81%:监狱 36%,警察环境 10%)。AUDIT 阳性的人更有可能涉及暴力犯罪(36.5%比 9.4%;P<0.001),而不太可能涉及财产犯罪(27.7%比 45.3%;P=0.03)。样本的四分之三(74%)报告说,他们不会感到被迫参与关于他们饮酒的干预。与 AUDIT 相比,FAST 和 M-SASQ 的筛查性能具有可接受性,曲线下面积分别为 0.97 和 0.92。
结果证实,刑事司法系统中存在严重的酒精使用问题,这会影响健康和犯罪行为。在三种刑事司法环境中,缓刑被发现最适合进行筛查。参与者对在缓刑环境中接受酒精使用干预措施持积极态度。