Mathias Charles W, Moon Tae-Joon, Karns-Wright Tara E, Hill-Kapturczak Nathalie, Roache John D, Mullen Jillian, Dougherty Donald M
a Department of Psychiatry , The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , San Antonio , Texas.
b Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , San Antonio , Texas.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1528500. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is used to assess the level of alcohol use/misuse and to inform the intensity of intervention delivered within screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) programs. Policy initiatives are recommending delivery of SBIRT within health care settings to reduce alcohol misuse and prevent alcohol-impaired driving. Recent reports are considering extending delivery of SBIRT to criminal justice settings. One consideration in implementing SBIRT delivery is the question of resource utilization; the amount of effort required in delivering the 4 different intensities of intervention in SBIRT: Alcohol education, simple advice, brief counseling and continued monitoring, and brief counseling and referral to specialist (from least to most intense in terms of delivery time, the skill level of the provider, and personnel resources).
In order to inform expectations about intervention intensity, this article describes the AUDIT scores from 982 adults recently arrested for alcohol-impaired driving. The distribution of scores is extrapolated to state rates for individuals arrested for alcohol-impaired driving by intervention level.
Though alcohol education was the most common intervention category, about one quarter of the sample scored in a range corresponding with the more intensive interventions using the brief counseling, continued monitoring for ongoing alcohol use, and/or referral to specialist for diagnostic evaluation and treatment.
This article provides local distribution of AUDIT scores and state estimates for the number of individuals scoring in each level of risk (AUDIT risk zone) and corresponding intervention type. Routine criminal justice practice is well positioned to deliver alcohol screening, education, simple advice, and continued alcohol monitoring, making delivery of SBIRT feasible for the majority of alcohol-impaired drivers. Challenges to implementing the full range of SBIRT services include resource demands of brief counseling, identifying the appropriate providers within a criminal justice context, and availability of community providers for referral to diagnostic and specialty care. Solutions may vary by state due to differences in population density and incidence rates of alcohol-impaired driving.
酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)用于评估酒精使用/滥用水平,并为筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(SBIRT)项目中的干预强度提供参考。政策倡议建议在医疗保健环境中实施SBIRT,以减少酒精滥用并预防酒驾。近期报告正在考虑将SBIRT扩展至刑事司法环境。实施SBIRT的一个考量因素是资源利用问题;在SBIRT中提供4种不同强度干预所需的工作量:酒精教育、简单建议、简短咨询及持续监测,以及简短咨询并转介至专科医生(从交付时间、提供者技能水平和人力资源来看,强度由低到高)。
为了了解对干预强度的预期,本文描述了982名近期因酒驾被捕的成年人的AUDIT分数。分数分布被外推至因酒驾被捕个体按干预水平划分的州比率。
尽管酒精教育是最常见的干预类别,但约四分之一的样本得分对应的范围与使用简短咨询、持续监测饮酒情况和/或转介至专科医生进行诊断评估和治疗的更强干预措施相符。
本文提供了AUDIT分数的本地分布情况,以及每个风险水平(AUDIT风险区)得分个体数量和相应干预类型的州估计值。常规刑事司法实践完全有能力提供酒精筛查、教育、简单建议和持续的酒精监测,这使得为大多数酒驾者提供SBIRT成为可能。实施全方位SBIRT服务面临的挑战包括简短咨询的资源需求、在刑事司法背景下确定合适的提供者,以及社区提供者是否可用于转介至诊断和专科护理。由于人口密度和酒驾发生率的差异,不同州的解决方案可能会有所不同。