Division of Orthodontics, Health Center, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 May;141(5):538-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.016.
The purpose of this research was to evaluate microdamage accumulation after mini-implant placement by self-drilling (without a pilot hole) and self-tapping (screwed into a pilot hole) insertion techniques. The null hypothesis was that the mini-implant insertion technique would have no influence on microcrack accumulation and propagation in the cortical bones of the maxillae and mandibles of adult hounds.
Mini-implants (n = 162; diameter, 1.6 mm; length, 6 mm) were placed in the maxillae and mandibles of 9 hounds (12-14 months old) with self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques. The techniques were randomly assigned to the left or the right side of each jaw. Each hound received 18 mini-implants (10 in the mandible, 8 in the maxilla). Histomorphometric parameters including total crack length and crack surface density were measured. The null hypothesis was rejected in favor of an alternate hypothesis: that the self-drilling technique results in more microdamage (microcracks) accumulation in the adjacent cortical bone in both the maxilla and the mandible immediately after mini-implant placement. A cluster level analysis was used to analyze the data on the outcome measured. Since the measurements were clustered within dogs, a paired-samples t test was used to analyze the average differences between insertion methods at both jaw locations. A significance level of 0.05 was used for both analyses.
The self-drilling technique resulted in greater total crack lengths in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 18.70 ± 7.04 μm/mm(2); CI, 13.29-24.11; mandible: mean difference, 22.98 ± 6.43 μm/mm(2); CI, 18.04-27.93; P <0.05), higher crack surface density in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 10.39 ± 9.16 μm/mm(2); CI, 3.34-17.43; mandible: mean difference, 11.28 ± 3.41 μm/mm(2); CI, 8.65-13.90; P <0.05).
This study demonstrated greater microdamage in the cortical bones of adult hounds in both the maxilla and the mandible by the self-drilling insertion technique compared with the self-tapping technique.
本研究旨在评估迷你种植体自攻(无导孔)和自钻(旋入导孔)植入技术对微损伤积累的影响。零假设是,种植体植入技术不会影响成年猎犬上颌骨和下颌骨皮质骨中的微裂纹的积累和扩展。
将 162 个直径 1.6 毫米、长 6 毫米的迷你种植体(n = 162)分别植入 9 只猎犬(12-14 个月龄)的上颌骨和下颌骨中,采用自攻和自钻植入技术。两种技术随机分配到每只犬的左右两侧下颌骨。每只犬共植入 18 个迷你种植体(下颌骨 10 个,上颌骨 8 个)。测量总裂纹长度和裂纹表面密度等组织形态计量学参数。零假设被拒绝,替代假设被接受:自钻技术会导致迷你种植体植入后即刻,上颌骨和下颌骨相邻皮质骨中微损伤(微裂纹)的积累更多。采用聚类水平分析对测量结果进行数据分析。由于测量值在犬之间呈聚类分布,因此采用配对样本 t 检验分析两种植入方法在两个颌骨位置的平均差异。两种分析均采用 0.05 的显著性水平。
自钻技术导致上颌骨和下颌骨的总裂纹长度均显著增加(上颌骨:平均差异,18.70 ± 7.04 μm/mm²;置信区间,13.29-24.11;下颌骨:平均差异,22.98 ± 6.43 μm/mm²;置信区间,18.04-27.93;P <0.05),裂纹表面密度也显著增加(上颌骨:平均差异,10.39 ± 9.16 μm/mm²;置信区间,3.34-17.43;下颌骨:平均差异,11.28 ± 3.41 μm/mm²;置信区间,8.65-13.90;P <0.05)。
与自攻技术相比,本研究表明自钻植入技术在上颌骨和下颌骨中导致成年猎犬皮质骨中的微损伤更大。