Gallego Vilar D, García Fadrique G, Di Capua Sacoto C, Beltran Persiva J, Perez Mestre M, De Francia J A, Povo Martin I, Miralles Aguado J, Garau Perelló C, Sanchis Verdu L, Gallego Gomez J
Hospital General de Castellón, Castellon de la plana, Castellón, Spain.
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0. Epub 2012 May 4.
Patient collaboration in external shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is critical for its correct application, making proper analgesic selection indispensable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined application of EMLA and intravenous (i.v.) pethidine compared with pethidine plus placebo cream in patients undergoing ESWL for ureteral and/or renal lithiasis. Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients receiving ESWL for renal and/or ureterolithiasis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive i.v. pethidine plus either EMLA cream (group A) or placebo hydrating cream (group B). Evaluated were type, location, and size of lithiasis, patient's sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of pain, and degree of lithiasis fragmentation. EMLA cream provided significantly better pain relief and lithiasis fragmentation and more completed ESWL treatment. Topical application of EMLA cream combined with i.v. pethidine improved VAS scores and lithiasis fragmentation and decreased the rate of withdrawal from ESWL procedure versus i.v. pethidine plus placebo therapy.
患者在体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的配合对于该技术的正确应用至关重要,因此合理选择镇痛方法必不可少。本研究旨在评估复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)与静脉注射哌替啶联合应用,相较于哌替啶加安慰剂乳膏,在输尿管和/或肾结石行ESWL治疗患者中的疗效。对接受ESWL治疗肾和/或输尿管结石的患者进行前瞻性、对照、随机、双盲研究。患者被随机分配接受静脉注射哌替啶加复方利多卡因乳膏(A组)或安慰剂保湿乳膏(B组)。评估指标包括结石的类型、位置和大小、患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、合并症、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分以及结石破碎程度。复方利多卡因乳膏在缓解疼痛、结石破碎方面效果显著更好,且ESWL治疗完成率更高。与静脉注射哌替啶加安慰剂治疗相比,复方利多卡因乳膏联合静脉注射哌替啶可改善VAS评分和结石破碎程度,并降低ESWL治疗中断率。