Suppr超能文献

局麻药混合物在体外冲击波碎石术治疗中减轻疼痛的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 5;15(10):e0237783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237783. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) on pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases (updated March 2020) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of EMLA for patients that underwent ESWL. The search strategy and study selection process were managed according to the PRISMA statement. Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the results indicated that EMLA significantly reduced pain compared to the control group (RR = -2.98, 95% CI = -5.82 to -0.13, P = 0.04) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 57% (P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis showed that EMLA did not significantly reduce pain when the patients took an analgesic premedication (RR = -1.46, 95% CI = -5.89 to 2.98, P = 0.52) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 38% (P = 0.52). Conversely, studies without premedication showed a significant pain relief effect (RR = -4.08, 95% CI = -7.36 to -0.65, P = -0.80) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 48% (P = 0.14). Most studies showed there was no difference in the patient's need for analgesics. EMLA was effective for reducing pain during EWSL. However, this analgesic effect was limited and did not reduce the need for analgesics.

摘要

一项系统评价和荟萃分析探讨了局部麻醉剂混合物(EMLA)在体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中减轻疼痛的效果。检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、EBSCO 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库(更新至 2020 年 3 月),以评估 EMLA 对接受 ESWL 治疗的患者的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。搜索策略和研究选择过程按照 PRISMA 声明进行管理。荟萃分析纳入了 6 项 RCT。总体而言,结果表明 EMLA 与对照组相比显著减轻疼痛(RR=-2.98,95%CI=-5.82 至-0.13,P=0.04),异质性为 I2=57%(P=0.04)。亚组分析表明,当患者服用止痛药预用药时,EMLA 并未显著减轻疼痛(RR=-1.46,95%CI=-5.89 至 2.98,P=0.52),异质性为 I2=38%(P=0.52)。相反,没有预用药的研究显示出显著的止痛效果(RR=-4.08,95%CI=-7.36 至-0.65,P=-0.80),异质性为 I2=48%(P=0.14)。大多数研究表明患者对镇痛药的需求没有差异。EMLA 对 EWSL 期间的疼痛有效。然而,这种镇痛效果是有限的,并没有减少对镇痛药的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef5/7535034/fe60f2860deb/pone.0237783.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验