Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035694. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
Social learning and the formation of traditions rely on the ability and willingness to copy one another. A central question is under which conditions individuals adapt behaviour to social influences. Here, we demonstrate that similarities in food processing techniques emerge on the level of matrilines (mother-offspring) but not on the group level in an experiment on six groups of wild vervet monkeys that involved grapes covered with sand. Monkeys regularly ate unclean grapes but also used four cleaning techniques more similarly within matrilines: rubbing in hands, rubbing on substrate, open with mouth, and open with hands. Individual cleaning techniques evolved over time as they converged within matrilines, stabilised at the end and remained stable in a follow-up session more than one year later. The similarity within matrilines persisted when we analyzed only foraging events of individuals in the absence of other matriline members and matriline members used more similar methods than adult full sisters. Thus, momentary conversion or purely genetic causation are unlikely explanations, favouring social learning as mechanism for within matriline similarities. The restriction of traditions to matriline membership rather than to the group level may restrict the development of culture in monkeys relative to apes or humans.
社会学习和传统的形成依赖于相互模仿的能力和意愿。一个核心问题是在什么条件下个体能够适应社会影响。在这里,我们通过对涉及被沙覆盖的葡萄的 6 组野生长尾猕猴进行的实验表明,在母系(母亲-后代)水平上会出现食物加工技术的相似性,但在群体水平上不会出现这种情况。猴子经常吃不干净的葡萄,但也更相似地在母系内使用了四种清洁技术:在手心中摩擦、在基质上摩擦、用嘴打开和用手打开。个体清洁技术随着时间的推移在母系内趋同而演变,最终在随访中稳定下来,且在一年多后仍保持稳定。当我们只分析没有其他母系成员的个体的觅食事件,并且母系成员使用的方法比成年全姐妹更相似时,母系内的相似性仍然存在。因此,瞬间转换或纯粹的遗传原因不太可能是解释,支持社会学习是母系内相似性的机制。传统仅限于母系成员而不是群体水平,这可能限制了猴子相对于猿类或人类的文化发展。