• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速康复外科(ERAS®)方案下开腹与腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术的比较(ORANGE II 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 May 6;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-54.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-54
PMID:22559239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3409025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of lLaparoscopic liver resection in terms of time to functional recovery, length of hospital stay (LOS), long-term abdominal wall hernias, costs and quality of life (QOL) has never been studied in a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, this is the subject of the international multicentre randomised controlled ORANGE II trial.

METHODS

Patients eligible for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) of the liver will be recruited and randomised at the outpatient clinic. All randomised patients will undergo surgery in the setting of an ERAS programme. The experimental design produces two randomised arms (open and laparoscopic LLS) and a prospective registry. The prospective registry will be based on patients that cannot be randomised because of the explicit treatment preference of the patient or surgeon, or because of ineligibility (not meeting the in- and exclusion criteria) for randomisation in this trial. Therefore, all non-randomised patients undergoing LLS will be approached to participate in the prospective registry, thereby allowing acquisition of an uninterrupted prospective series of patients. The primary endpoint of the ORANGE II trial is time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints are postoperative LOS, percentage readmission, (liver-specific) morbidity, QOL, body image and cosmetic result, hospital and societal costs over 1 year, and long-term incidence of incisional hernias. It will be assumed that in patients undergoing laparoscopic LLS, length of hospital stay can be reduced by two days. A sample size of 55 patients in each randomisation arm has been calculated to detect a 2-day reduction in LOS (90% power and α = 0.05 (two-tailed)).The ORANGE II trial is a multicenter randomised controlled trial that will provide evidence on the merits of laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing LLS within an enhanced recovery ERAS programme.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00874224.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术在功能恢复时间、住院时间( LOS )、长期腹壁疝、成本和生活质量( QOL )方面从未在随机对照试验中进行过研究。因此,这是国际多中心随机对照 ORANGE II 试验的主题。

方法

将在门诊招募并随机选择符合左外侧肝段切除术( LLS )条件的患者。所有随机患者都将在 ERAS 计划的环境下进行手术。实验设计产生了两个随机组(开放和腹腔镜 LLS )和一个前瞻性登记处。前瞻性登记处将基于不能随机分组的患者,原因是患者或外科医生明确的治疗偏好,或因不符合本试验的纳入和排除标准而不适合随机分组。因此,所有接受 LLS 的非随机患者都将被邀请参加前瞻性登记处,从而允许获得不间断的前瞻性患者系列。ORANGE II 试验的主要终点是功能恢复时间。次要终点是术后 LOS 、再入院率、(肝脏特异性)发病率、QOL 、身体形象和美容效果、1 年内的医院和社会成本以及长期切口疝发生率。假设接受腹腔镜 LLS 的患者,住院时间可以缩短两天。计算出每组 55 例随机分组的样本量,以检测 LOS 缩短 2 天( 90%的功率和α=0.05 (双侧))。ORANGE II 试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,将为接受强化康复 ERAS 计划的 LLS 患者腹腔镜手术的优点提供证据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00874224。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba4b/3409025/d591fc8a51c1/1745-6215-13-54-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba4b/3409025/64faedf522fa/1745-6215-13-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba4b/3409025/d591fc8a51c1/1745-6215-13-54-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba4b/3409025/64faedf522fa/1745-6215-13-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba4b/3409025/d591fc8a51c1/1745-6215-13-54-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.加速康复外科(ERAS®)方案下开腹与腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术的比较(ORANGE II 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 May 6;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-54.
2
Total laparoscopic partial hepatectomy versus open partial hepatectomy for primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.全腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗原发性左肝内胆管结石:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07476-w.
3
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study).开放与腹腔镜左半肝切除术在加速康复外科方案中的随机临床试验(ORANGE II 研究)。
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):525-535. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10438. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术在强化康复方案中的比较(ORANGE 节段):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy.机器人与腹腔镜左外叶切除术治疗复杂病例。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Laparoscopic vs. open left lateral sectionectomy: An update meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹左外侧段切除术的比较:一项随机和非随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jan;61:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开放性与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移(奥斯陆-结直肠癌肝转移研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 4;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5.
8
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
9
Stapleless laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the Louisville statement by a young liver surgeon.用于肝细胞癌的免钉合腹腔镜左外侧段切除术:一位年轻肝脏外科医生对路易斯维尔声明的重新评估
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 28;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0903-y.
10
Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜肝切除术后强化康复护理与传统护理的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2746-2757. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of open (CUSA) versus laparoscopic (LOTUS) major hepatectomy - revisited. First evaluation of efficacy and safety of AEON™ stapler.开腹(CUSA)与腹腔镜(LOTUS)肝大部切除术围手术期结果的比较——再探讨。AEON™吻合器有效性与安全性的首次评估。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 23;15:1616876. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1616876. eCollection 2025.
2
Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术在强化康复方案中的比较(ORANGE 节段):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery.制定肝外科随机对照试验的复合终点。
Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1138-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7503. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy.单中心腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术的对比研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 May;15(5):818-23. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1468-z. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year Norwegian single-center experience.
Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma-Western versus Eastern attitude.
肝细胞癌的外科治疗——西方与东方的态度
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S245-S260. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.12.28.
4
Comparison of Outcomes Between Open Major Hepatectomy Using CUSA and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy Using "Lotus" Liver Blade. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.使用超声外科吸引器的开放性大肝切除术与使用“莲花”肝叶刀的腹腔镜大肝切除术的疗效比较。一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Front Surg. 2019 May 31;6:33. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00033. eCollection 2019.
5
Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: a European perspective.结直肠癌肝转移的外科治疗:欧洲视角
Hepat Oncol. 2014 Jan;1(1):121-133. doi: 10.2217/hep.13.3. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Enhanced Recovery in Liver Transplantation: A Feasibility Study.肝移植中的加速康复:一项可行性研究
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):230-241. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4747-y.
7
[Identical oncological results with lower perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic liver resection : Results of a matched pair analysis].[腹腔镜肝切除术后围手术期发病率较低但肿瘤学结果相同:配对分析结果]
Chirurg. 2018 Dec;89(12):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0646-x.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Formal Right and Left Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗左右半肝切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2627-2634. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4524-y.
9
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术(LEOPARD-2):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4.
10
Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜肝切除术后强化康复护理与传统护理的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2746-2757. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
腹腔镜肝切除术治疗恶性和良性病变:挪威单中心十年经验
Arch Surg. 2010 Jan;145(1):34-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.229.
4
The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.腹腔镜肝脏手术的国际立场:《2008年路易斯维尔声明》
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
5
Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations.结直肠手术围手术期最佳护理的共识性综述:术后加速康复(ERAS)小组建议
Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170.
6
Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care.腹腔镜下大肝切除术:治疗标准的演变
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):856-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bcaf46.
7
World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.全球腹腔镜肝切除术回顾——2804例患者
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df.
8
The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility.腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线:提高可行性和可重复性。
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):772-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2.
9
Laparoscopic versus open left lateral segmentectomy.腹腔镜与开放左外侧段切除术
BMC Surg. 2009 Sep 7;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-14.
10
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched-pair case control study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的比较:一项配对病例对照研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Dec;13(12):2276-83. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0993-5. Epub 2009 Sep 2.