• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

64 层多排螺旋 CT 冠状动脉造影显示支架内面积狭窄:支架最小管腔横截面积的最佳截断值与血管内超声比较。

In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28 Suppl 1:21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x. Epub 2012 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x
PMID:22562285
Abstract

We aimed to prospectively assess the optimal cutoff value for a minimum lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) compared with an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In 39 patients with 43 stents, the minimum lumen diameter, stent diameter, diameter stenosis, minimum lumen CSA, stent CSA, and area stenosis at the narrowest point were measured independently on 64-slice MDCT and IVUS images. For the assessment of diameter and CSA, 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.82 for minimum lumen diameter, r = 0.66 for stent diameter, r = 0.79 for minimum lumen CSA, and r = 0.75 for stent CSA, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the assessment of diameter and area stenoses, a 64-slice MDCT showed good correlations with IVUS (r = 0.89 and 0.91, respectively, P < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to detect in-stent area restenosis (≥ 50 % area stenosis) of a 64-slice MDCT were 77, 100, 100, and 91 %, respectively. The cutoff value of a 64-slice MDCT, determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, was 5.0 mm(2) with 76.5 % sensitivity and 92.3 % specificity for significant in-stent area restenosis; the area under the ROC curve was 0.902 (P < 0.0001). A good correlation was found between a 64-slice MDCT and the IVUS, regarding the assessment of diameter and area stenoses of coronary stents in selected patients implanted with stents of more than 3 mm in diameter. Optimal cutoff value for the minimum lumen CSA of coronary stents on the 64-slice MDCT is 5 mm(2) to predict a CSA of 4 mm(2) on IVUS.

摘要

我们旨在前瞻性评估与血管内超声(IVUS)相比,64 层多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)上最小管腔横截面积(CSA)的最佳截断值。在 39 例 43 个支架的患者中,分别在 64 层 MDCT 和 IVUS 图像上独立测量最小管腔直径、支架直径、直径狭窄度、最小管腔 CSA、支架 CSA 和最狭窄点的面积狭窄度。对于直径和 CSA 的评估,64 层 MDCT 与 IVUS 显示出良好的相关性(最小管腔直径 r = 0.82,支架直径 r = 0.66,最小管腔 CSA r = 0.79,支架 CSA r = 0.75,均 P <0.0001)。对于直径和面积狭窄度的评估,64 层 MDCT 与 IVUS 显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.89 和 0.91,均 P <0.0001)。64 层 MDCT 检测支架内面积再狭窄(≥50%面积狭窄)的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 77%、100%、100%和 91%。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)分析确定的 64 层 MDCT 的截断值为 5.0mm²,对有意义的支架内面积再狭窄的敏感性为 76.5%,特异性为 92.3%;ROC 曲线下面积为 0.902(P <0.0001)。在选定的植入直径大于 3mm 的支架的患者中,64 层 MDCT 与 IVUS 之间在评估冠状动脉支架的直径和面积狭窄方面具有良好的相关性。64 层 MDCT 上冠状动脉支架最小管腔 CSA 的最佳截断值为 5mm²,以预测 IVUS 上 4mm² 的 CSA。

相似文献

1
In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.64 层多排螺旋 CT 冠状动脉造影显示支架内面积狭窄:支架最小管腔横截面积的最佳截断值与血管内超声比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28 Suppl 1:21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x. Epub 2012 May 6.
2
Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.紫杉醇洗脱支架置入术后最小支架面积对 9 个月随访通畅率的影响:来自 TAXUS IV、V、VI 及 TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse、长病变、直接支架试验的血管内超声综合分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.005.
3
Evaluation of coronary artery stent patency by using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and conventional coronary angiography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasonography.采用 64 层多排螺旋 CT 与常规冠状动脉造影评估冠状动脉支架通畅性:与血管内超声的对比研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 5;166(1):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
4
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架内通畅情况。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Dec;22(8):540-52. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834c1a28.
5
Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging.功能显著的支架内再狭窄的预测因素:使用冠状动脉造影、血管内超声和心肌灌注成像的综合分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(11):1183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.09.006.
6
Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound.多层 CT 评估左主干冠状动脉支架置入后支架内的尺寸:与三维血管内超声的比较。
Heart. 2013 Aug;99(15):1106-12. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303679. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not?64 层多排螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像评估支架通畅性的体内研究:我们是否应该这样做?
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;28(3):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9842-1. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
8
Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.64层螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影术、有创冠状动脉造影术及血管内超声评估支架内再狭窄的可行性及诊断准确性比较
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 15;103(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.343. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
9
Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jun 1;69(7):933-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21130.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术评估生物可吸收血管支架的诊断准确性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 May;11(5):722-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the healing process after percutaneous implantation of a cardiovascular device: a systematic review.经皮植入心血管装置后愈合过程的评估:一项系统综述。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;36(3):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01734-2. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.计算机断层血管造影术在检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄中的诊断性能:一项更新荟萃分析的证据。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5097-0. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
3
Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study.应用射频背向散射血管内超声作为参考标准对中等程度冠状动脉病变进行标准化、三维、定量冠状动脉计算机断层扫描斑块测量的前瞻性验证:来自 ATLANTA(应用血流储备分数、血管内超声和虚拟组织学以及动脉粥样斑块无创计算机断层扫描评估组织特征、病变形态和血流动力学)I 研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.008.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis.64 层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像诊断支架内再狭窄的准确性:荟萃分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jun;17(3):470-8. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
《国际心血管影像杂志》2012年心血管成像相关内容
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Apr;29(4):725-36. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0216-8.
3
Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial.应用 64 层 MDCT 评估支架内再狭窄:CORE-64 多中心国际试验分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):85-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2652.
4
Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.64层螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影术、有创冠状动脉造影术及血管内超声评估支架内再狭窄的可行性及诊断准确性比较
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 15;103(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.343. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
5
Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound.血管造影不确定的左主干冠状动脉狭窄:与多排螺旋计算机断层扫描及血管内超声的相关性
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Jun;24(5):557-63. doi: 10.1007/s10554-007-9290-0. Epub 2007 Dec 30.
6
Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.64层冠状动脉多排螺旋CT血管造影对比增强成像与传统冠状动脉造影用于支架评估
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):424-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061389. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb;18(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
8
Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis.64层多层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影评估支架内再狭窄的效用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 5;49(22):2204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.045. Epub 2007 May 23.
9
Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描用于评估左主干冠状动脉支架置入术后支架通畅情况:与传统冠状动脉造影和血管内超声的比较
Circulation. 2006 Aug 15;114(7):645-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.608950. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.16层多排螺旋CT检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄与检测非支架置入冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5. Epub 2006 May 30.