Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;33(8):613-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304648. Epub 2012 May 4.
The aim of this study was to verify the validity of the curvature constant parameter (W'), calculated from 2-parameter mathematical equations of critical power model, in estimating the anaerobic capacity and anaerobic work capacity from a table tennis-specific test. Specifically, we aimed to i) compare constants estimated from three critical intensity models in a table tennis-specific test (Cf); ii) correlate each estimated W' with the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD); iii) correlate each W' with the total amount of anaerobic work (W ANAER) performed in each exercise bout performed during the Cf test. Nine national-standard male table tennis players participated in the study. MAOD was 63.0(10.8) mL · kg - 1 and W' values were 32.8(6.6) balls for the linear-frequency model, 38.3(6.9) balls for linear-total balls model, 48.7(8.9) balls for Nonlinear-2 parameter model. Estimated W' from the Nonlinear 2-parameter model was significantly different from W' from the other 2 models (P<0.05). Also, none W' values were significantly correlated with MAOD or W ANAER (r ranged from - 0.58 to 0.51; P>0.13). Thus, W' estimated from the 2-parameter mathematical equations did not correlate with MAOD or W ANAER in table tennis-specific tests, indicating that W' may not provide a strong and valid estimation of anaerobic capacity and anaerobic capacity work.
本研究旨在验证从 2 参数数学方程计算得出的曲率常数参数 (W') 在估计特定乒乓球测试的无氧能力和无氧工作能力方面的有效性。具体而言,我们旨在:i) 比较三种特定乒乓球测试的临界强度模型估计的常数 (Cf);ii) 使每个估计的 W'与最大累积氧亏(MAOD)相关;iii) 使每个 W'与 Cf 测试中每个练习回合的总无氧工作量(WANAER)相关。9 名国家级男性乒乓球运动员参与了研究。MAOD 为 63.0(10.8)mL·kg-1,W'值分别为 32.8(6.6)个球,线性频率模型;38.3(6.9)个球,线性总球模型;48.7(8.9)个球,非线性 2 参数模型。非线性 2 参数模型估计的 W'与其他 2 个模型的 W'有显著差异(P<0.05)。此外,没有 W'值与 MAOD 或 WANAER 显著相关(r 值范围从 -0.58 到 0.51;P>0.13)。因此,特定乒乓球测试中,2 参数数学方程估计的 W'与 MAOD 或 WANAER 不相关,表明 W'可能无法提供无氧能力和无氧能力工作的有力和有效估计。