University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Division of Biostatistics, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 5, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):475-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21591.
We propose new classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome (SS), which are needed considering the emergence of biologic agents as potential treatments and their associated comorbidity. These criteria target individuals with signs/symptoms suggestive of SS.
Criteria are based on expert opinion elicited using the nominal group technique and analyses of data from the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance. Preliminary criteria validation included comparisons with classifications based on the American–European Consensus Group (AECG) criteria, a model-based “gold standard”obtained from latent class analysis (LCA) of data from a range of diagnostic tests, and a comparison with cases and controls collected from sources external to the population used for criteria development.
Validation results indicate high levels of sensitivity and specificity for the criteria. Case definition requires at least 2 of the following 3: 1) positive serum anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB or (positive rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody titer >1:320), 2) ocular staining score >3, or 3) presence of focal lymphocytic sialadenitis with a focus score >1 focus/4 mm2 in labial salivary gland biopsy samples. Observed agreement with the AECG criteria is high when these are applied using all objective tests. However, AECG classification based on allowable substitutions of symptoms for objective tests results in poor agreement with the proposed and LCA-derived classifications.
These classification criteria developed from registry data collected using standardized measures are based on objective tests. Validation indicates improved classification performance relative to existing alternatives, making them more suitable for application in situations where misclassification may present health risks.
鉴于生物制剂作为潜在治疗方法的出现及其相关的合并症,我们提出了干燥综合征(SS)的新分类标准。这些标准针对具有 SS 体征/症状提示的个体。
标准基于使用名义小组技术得出的专家意见以及 Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance 数据的分析。初步标准验证包括与基于美国-欧洲共识组(AECG)标准的分类、通过对来自一系列诊断测试的数据进行潜在类别分析(LCA)获得的基于模型的“金标准”、以及与从用于标准制定的人群以外的来源收集的病例和对照进行比较。
验证结果表明该标准具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。病例定义至少需要满足以下 3 项中的 2 项:1)血清抗 SSA 和/或抗 SSB 阳性或(类风湿因子和抗核抗体滴度阳性 >1:320),2)眼染色评分>3,或 3)唇腺活检样本中存在焦点评分>1 焦点/4mm2 的局灶性淋巴细胞涎腺炎。当使用所有客观测试应用 AECG 标准时,观察到与该标准的高度一致性。然而,基于允许用症状替代客观测试的 AECG 分类与所提出的和 LCA 衍生的分类标准的一致性较差。
这些从使用标准化测量方法收集的登记数据中开发的分类标准基于客观测试。验证表明与现有替代方法相比,分类性能得到了改善,使其更适合于可能存在健康风险的分类错误情况。