• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对高血压控制的目标强化干预是否有效?一项随机对照试验。

Is a targeted intensive intervention effective for improvements in hypertension control? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg Hospital, København NV, Denmark.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2012 Dec;29(6):626-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms031. Epub 2012 May 7.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cms031
PMID:22565110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important risk factors for stroke, and antihypertensive therapy significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, achieving a regulated BP in hypertensive patients is still a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an intervention targeting GPs' management of hypertension.

METHODS

A cluster randomized trial comprising 124 practices and 2646 patients with hypertension. In the Capital Region of Denmark, the participating GPs were randomized to an intensive or to a moderately intensive intervention group or to a control group and in Region Zealand and Region of Southern Denmark, practices were randomized into a moderately intensive intervention and to a control group. The main outcome measures were change in proportion of patients with high BP and change in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) from the first to the second registration.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with high BP in 2007 was reduced in 2009 by ~9% points. The mean SBP was reduced significantly from 2007 to 2009 by 3.61 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.26 to -2.96], and the DBP was reduced significantly by 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: -2.37 to -1.61). There was no additional impact in either of the intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no impact of the moderate intervention and no additional impact of the intensive intervention on BP.

摘要

背景

高血压(BP)是中风最重要的危险因素之一,降压治疗显著降低了心血管发病率和死亡率的风险。然而,高血压患者的血压控制仍然是一个挑战。

目的

评估针对全科医生高血压管理的干预措施的影响。

方法

一项包括 124 个实践和 2646 例高血压患者的集群随机试验。在丹麦首都大区,参与的全科医生被随机分配到强化干预组、适度强化干预组或对照组;在西兰大区和南丹麦大区,实践被随机分配到适度强化干预组和对照组。主要结局指标是从第一次登记到第二次登记时,高血压患者中血压高的比例和收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的变化。

结果

2007 年高血压患者中血压高的比例在 2009 年降低了约 9%。SBP 从 2007 年到 2009 年显著降低了 3.61mmHg(95%可信区间:-4.26 至-2.96),DBP 也显著降低了 1.99mmHg(95%可信区间:-2.37 至-1.61)。干预组均未产生额外影响。

结论

适度干预对血压没有影响,强化干预也没有额外影响。

相似文献

1
Is a targeted intensive intervention effective for improvements in hypertension control? A randomized controlled trial.针对高血压控制的目标强化干预是否有效?一项随机对照试验。
Fam Pract. 2012 Dec;29(6):626-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms031. Epub 2012 May 7.
2
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
3
Treatment of 5413 hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study.治疗 5413 例高血压患者:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):599-607. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr027. Epub 2011 May 19.
4
Effectiveness of a protocol-based strategy for achieving better blood pressure control in general practice.基于方案的策略在普通实践中实现更好血压控制的效果。
Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):55-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp075. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
5
A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN).一项关于社区药剂师和护士护理对改善糖尿病患者血压管理效果的随机试验:药剂师-高血压心血管风险干预研究(SCRIP-HTN)。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2355-61. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2355.
6
Alcohol screening and brief counseling in a primary care hypertensive population: a quality improvement intervention.初级保健高血压人群中的酒精筛查与简短咨询:一项质量改进干预措施。
Addiction. 2008 Aug;103(8):1271-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02199.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
7
The association between hypertension-specific care management processes and blood pressure outcomes in US-based physician organizations.美国医生组织中高血压特定护理管理流程与血压结果之间的关联。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
8
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a treatment algorithm for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.一项关于2型糖尿病患者高血压治疗算法效果的整群随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Feb;57(535):136-43.
9
General practitioners' approach to hypertension in urban Pakistan: disturbing trends in practice.巴基斯坦城市全科医生对高血压的治疗方法:令人不安的实际趋势
Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1278-83. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157698.78949.D7.
10
Clinical inertia in general practice: widespread and related to the outcome of diabetes care.全科医疗中的临床惰性:普遍存在且与糖尿病治疗结果相关。
Fam Pract. 2009 Dec;26(6):428-36. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp053. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
The effect of a lifestyle management educational program on blood pressure, heart rate, and body mass index in patients with hypertension.生活方式管理教育项目对高血压患者血压、心率和体重指数的影响。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2020 Jan;16(1):7-15. doi: 10.22122/arya.v16i1.1502.
3
Danish Evaluation of Your Heart Forecast (DANY): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial on an interactive risk-communication tool aimed at improving adherence of patients with high blood pressure.
丹麦心脏预后评估(DANY):一项关于交互式风险沟通工具的群组随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在提高高血压患者的依从性。
Trials. 2020 Jan 3;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3886-2.
4
Effects of a Lifestyle Modification Program on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Hypertensive Patients with Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.生活方式改变计划对接受血管成形术的高血压患者的知识、态度和行为的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016 Oct;4(4):286-296.
5
Hypertension Management in Primary Care.基层医疗中的高血压管理
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Mar 11;113(10):167-74. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0167.
6
Hypertension management in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.基层医疗中的高血压管理:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 21;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0627-z.