Hebenstreit Claire L, DePrince Anne P
Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr;7(2):60-9. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.60.
We examine motivations for, and costs/benefits of, participation in three interviews across a one-year period among women recently exposed to intimate partner abuse (IPA). Recruited from publicly accessible police reports, women were not informed that the study focused on IPA in recruiting materials or when they scheduled the first interview. Women's ratings on the Response to Research Participation Questionnaire (RRPQ) indicated a positive benefit-to-cost ratio across all three interviews. Negative responses to participation as well as severity of IPA and PTSD symptoms did not predict retention at the next interview. These data demonstrate that studies asking about IPA experiences, even when survivors do not know in advance that IPA will be the focus of study, can be implemented within a stable benefit-to-cost ratio over time.
我们研究了近期遭受亲密伴侣虐待(IPA)的女性在一年时间内参加三次访谈的动机以及成本/收益情况。这些女性是从公开的警方报告中招募而来的,在招募材料中或安排首次访谈时,她们并未被告知该研究聚焦于亲密伴侣虐待。女性对《研究参与调查问卷》(RRPQ)的评分表明,在所有三次访谈中,收益成本比都是正向的。对参与的负面反应以及亲密伴侣虐待和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的严重程度并不能预测其是否会参加下一次访谈。这些数据表明,询问亲密伴侣虐待经历的研究,即使幸存者事先不知道亲密伴侣虐待将是研究重点,随着时间推移也可以在稳定的收益成本比范围内实施。