• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各州医疗补助计划参与率差异较大的原因,为 2014 年的覆盖范围扩大提供了借鉴。

Reasons for the wide variation in Medicaid participation rates among states hold lessons for coverage expansion in 2014.

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):909-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0977.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0977
PMID:22566429
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act will expand Medicaid eligibility in 2014 to adults with incomes of up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. To maximize this opportunity, policy makers need to ensure that participation, or "take-up," among eligible adults exceeds current rates. Using the Current Population Survey 2005-10, we estimated that the nationwide Medicaid participation rate was 62.6 percent among eligible adults ages 19-64 without private insurance. Take-up varied widely by state, from 43.0 percent in Arkansas and Louisiana to 82.8 percent in Massachusetts, after adjusting for population demographics. Participation was highest among disabled adults, 75.8 percent, and lowest among childless adults, 38.3 percent. Factors linked to higher take-up rates included low cost sharing for beneficiaries; more generous benefits; and greater use of managed care programs for Medicaid populations. Factors associated with lower take-up rates included the existence of asset tests in some states. Massachusetts's health reform was associated with a major increase in Medicaid participation. Our results suggest that when Medicaid is expanded in 2014, take-up may be less than anticipated because new enrollees will be offered a more restrictive set of benefits--known as "benchmark coverage"--compared to those in traditional Medicaid, and the majority of newly eligible adults will be in groups with traditionally low take-up (primarily nondisabled adults). To encourage high participation in the expanded Medicaid program, states will need to offer comprehensive coverage of needed benefits; provide community-based outreach; and consider more dramatic changes to their enrollment processes, such as automatically enrolling people in Medicaid based on their participation in other public programs.

摘要

平价医疗法案将于 2014 年扩大医疗补助计划的覆盖范围,将收入不超过联邦贫困线 133%的成年人纳入保障范围。为了最大限度地利用这一机会,政策制定者需要确保符合条件的成年人的参保率(即“参与率”)超过目前的水平。利用 2005-2010 年的当前人口调查数据,我们估计,在没有私人保险的 19-64 岁符合条件的成年人中,全国范围内的医疗补助计划参与率为 62.6%。调整人口统计数据后,各州的参与率差异很大,从阿肯色州和路易斯安那州的 43.0%到马萨诸塞州的 82.8%不等。参与率在残疾成年人中最高,为 75.8%,在无子女的成年人中最低,为 38.3%。与较高参与率相关的因素包括受益人的自付费用低;福利更慷慨;以及对医疗补助人群更多地使用管理式医疗计划。与较低参与率相关的因素包括在一些州存在资产测试。马萨诸塞州的医疗改革与医疗补助计划参与率的大幅增加有关。我们的研究结果表明,2014 年扩大医疗补助计划时,参与率可能低于预期,因为新参保者将获得一套比传统医疗补助计划更具限制性的福利(称为“基准保障”),而大多数新符合条件的成年人将处于传统参与率较低的群体中(主要是无残疾成年人)。为了鼓励在扩大的医疗补助计划中实现高参与率,各州将需要提供全面的所需福利覆盖范围;提供基于社区的外展服务;并考虑对其登记程序进行更重大的改革,例如根据人们参与其他公共计划的情况自动将其纳入医疗补助计划。

相似文献

1
Reasons for the wide variation in Medicaid participation rates among states hold lessons for coverage expansion in 2014.各州医疗补助计划参与率差异较大的原因,为 2014 年的覆盖范围扩大提供了借鉴。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):909-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0977.
2
Creation of state basic health programs would lead to 4 percent fewer people churning between Medicaid and exchanges.创建国家基本健康计划将导致 Medicaid 和交易所之间转换的人数减少 4%。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1314-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0986.
3
Disability benefit coverage and program interactions in the working-age population.劳动年龄人口的残疾福利覆盖范围及项目互动
Soc Secur Bull. 2008;68(1):1-30.
4
Eligibility for the Medicare buy-in programs, based on a survey of income and program participation simulation.基于收入调查和项目参与模拟的医疗保险购买计划资格。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(3):13-25.
5
As roughly 700,000 prisoners are released annually, about half will gain health coverage and care under federal laws.每年约有 70 万名囚犯获释,其中约有一半将根据联邦法律获得健康保险和医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):931-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0501.
6
In states' hands: how the decision to expand Medicaid will affect the most financially vulnerable Americans: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Surveys of U.S. Adults, 2011 and 2012.掌握在各州手中:医疗补助扩大计划的决策将如何影响经济上最脆弱的美国人群体——来自2011年和2012年英联邦基金美国成年人医疗保险跟踪调查的结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Sep;23:1-8.
7
Medicaid benefit designs for newly eligible adults: state approaches.新符合资格成年人的医疗补助计划设计:各州的做法。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 May;11:1-9.
8
Modeling SSI financial eligibility and simulating the effect of policy options.模拟医保补充保险(SSI)的财务资格并模拟政策选项的效果。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):16-45.
9
Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug discount card. Interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医疗保险处方药折扣卡。有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2003 Dec 15;68(240):69839-927.
10
Adults in the income range for the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion are healthier than pre-ACA enrollees.收入处于《平价医疗法案》中医疗补助扩大计划范围内的成年人比《平价医疗法案》实施前参保的人更健康。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Apr;33(4):691-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0743. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Administrative Burdens and Child Medicaid and CHIP Enrollments.行政负担与儿童医疗补助计划及儿童健康保险计划登记情况
Am J Health Econ. 2024 Spring;10(2):237-271. doi: 10.1086/728170. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Who Enrolls in Coverage and Who Remains Uninsured? Medicaid Take-Up Before and After the Affordable Care Act and During Unwinding.哪些人参加了保险,哪些人仍未参保?《平价医疗法案》实施前后及医保覆盖范围缩减期间的医疗补助计划参保情况
Milbank Q. 2025 Jun;103(2):349-389. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.70020. Epub 2025 May 26.
3
Long-Term Care Partnership Effects on Medicaid and Private Insurance.
长期护理伙伴关系对医疗补助计划和私人保险的影响。
Health Econ. 2025 Jun;34(6):1171-1187. doi: 10.1002/hec.4949. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
4
Implementing automated Medicaid eligibility renewals was not associated with higher levels of program participation.实施医疗补助资格自动续保与更高水平的项目参与度无关。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 May 22;2(6):qxae071. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae071. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Does Administrative Burden Deter Young People? Evidence from Summer Jobs Programs.行政负担会阻碍年轻人吗?来自暑期工作项目的证据。
J Behav Public Adm. 2022;5(1). doi: 10.30636/jbpa.51.300. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
6
Racial Disparities in Pediatric Psychiatric Emergencies: A Health Systems Approach.儿科精神科急诊中的种族差异:一种卫生系统方法。
J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2020;5(2). doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20200006. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Did Medicaid expansion close African American-white health care disparities nationwide? A scoping review.医疗补助扩大计划是否缩小了全国范围内非裔美国人-白人的医疗保健差距?范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1638. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14033-8.
8
COVID-19-Related Insurance Coverage Changes and Disparities in Access to Care Among Low-Income US Adults in 4 Southern States.COVID-19 相关保险覆盖范围变化与美国南部 4 个州低收入成年人获得医疗服务的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 13;2(8):e212007. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2007. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Comparison of Income Eligibility for Medicaid vs Marketplace Coverage for Insurance Enrollment Among Low-Income US Adults.比较美国低收入成年人通过医疗补助和市场交易获得医疗保险的收入资格。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 14;2(6):e210771. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0771. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Effect of Major Illness Insurance on Vulnerability to Poverty: Evidence From China.大病保险对贫困脆弱性的影响:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;9:791817. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.791817. eCollection 2021.