Suppr超能文献

单注射点球周麻醉与球后麻醉的比较。

Comparison of one-injection-site peribulbar anesthesia and retrobulbar anesthesia.

作者信息

Whitsett J C, Balyeat H D, McClure B

机构信息

Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Mar;16(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80738-9.

Abstract

One hundred patients having elective cataract surgery were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study comparing retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia. Patients were divided into two study groups and evaluated on three criteria felt to be critical to intraocular surgery. Results showed that the efficacy of the one-injection-site peribulbar block was similar to that of the retrobulbar block for all three criteria. Because the one-injection-site anesthetic is administered outside the muscle cone, the potential for optic nerve and central nervous system complications should be minimized.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,对100例择期行白内障手术的患者进行了评估,比较球后麻醉和球周麻醉。患者被分为两个研究组,并根据对眼内手术至关重要的三个标准进行评估。结果显示,对于所有三个标准,单点注射球周阻滞的效果与球后阻滞相似。由于单点注射麻醉剂是在肌锥外给药,视神经和中枢神经系统并发症的可能性应降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验