Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 May;19(3):195-201. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.001.
Vascular access is the lifeline of hemodialysis patients. Currently, arteriovenous fistulae and grafts are considered permanent options for vascular access, and they share common access problems. The successful creation of a permanent vascular access depends on patient characteristics, vessel parameters, and possibly genetic factors. Utilization of a dialysis access at least 3 times a week leads to significant wear and tear of the access. The buttonhole technique is associated with a higher incidence of infection, and evidence regarding various perceived advantages remain contradictory. Infiltration and aneurysm formation of an access are common, and the literature on its impact on vascular access outcomes is limited. A patient who undergoes hemodialysis often requires multiple accesses during his or her lifetime, and the maintenance of a persistent vascular access may require creative solutions. Intensified research is crucial to comprehending the pathophysiology and treatment options for some of the common problems of vascular accesses.
血管通路是血液透析患者的生命线。目前,动静脉瘘和移植物被认为是血管通路的永久性选择,它们有共同的通路问题。永久性血管通路的成功建立取决于患者的特征、血管参数,可能还有遗传因素。每周至少使用透析通路 3 次会导致通路的显著磨损。扣眼技术与更高的感染发生率相关,而关于各种被认为的优势的证据仍然存在矛盾。通路的渗漏和动脉瘤形成很常见,关于其对血管通路结局影响的文献有限。接受血液透析的患者在其一生中通常需要多个通路,维持持久的血管通路可能需要创造性的解决方案。加强研究对于理解血管通路一些常见问题的病理生理学和治疗选择至关重要。