Suppr超能文献

一项关于单剂量安米乐/2,4-二氯苯甲醇加利多卡因锭或己基间苯二酚锭治疗上呼吸道感染引起的急性咽痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a single dose of an amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol plus lidocaine lozenge or a hexylresorcinol lozenge for the treatment of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection.

机构信息

Ormeau Health Centre, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15(2):281-94. doi: 10.18433/j31309.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sore throat is a frequent reason for seeking medical care but few prescription options are available. Lozenges are effective in delivering active ingredients to the throat. This study was conducted to determine the analgesic efficacy of two lozenges one containing amylmetacresol (AMC)/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (DCBA) and lidocaine and one containing hexylresorcinol  versus placebo in patients with acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. In total, 190 patients were randomised 1:1:1 to a single dose of AMC/DCBA + lidocaine, hexylresorcinol or placebo lozenge. Subjective ratings of throat soreness, difficulty swallowing, swollen throat, numbing, and sore throat relief were obtained up to 2 hours post dose. Patient and investigator global ratings and a consumer questionnaire were also collected. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in severity of throat soreness for both lozenges versus placebo at 2 hours post dose.

RESULTS

The hexylresorcinol lozenge demonstrated superiority over placebo for primary and secondary efficacy variables including those related to throat soreness, sore throat relief and difficulty swallowing; the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge was also superior to placebo for secondary endpoints at various time points but did not reach significance for the primary efficacy variable. Both lozenges had a rapid onset of action from 1-10 minutes post dose for the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge and 1-5 minutes post dose for the hexylresorcinol lozenge. Numbness was reported from 1 minute post dose with the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge and was greatest at 15 minutes. Numbness was reported from 5 minutes post dose with the hexylresorcinol lozenge and was greatest at 10 minutes. Both lozenges were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Both AMC/DCBA + lidocaine and hexylresorcinol lozenges provided rapid and effective sore throat relief in patients with URTI.

摘要

目的

喉咙痛是寻求医疗的常见原因,但可供选择的处方很少。锭剂在将活性成分递送到喉咙方面非常有效。本研究旨在确定两种锭剂(一种含有邻甲氨基酚(AMC)/2,4-二氯苯甲醇(DCBA)和利多卡因,另一种含有己基间苯二酚)在治疗上呼吸道感染(URTI)引起的急性喉咙痛患者中的镇痛效果,与安慰剂相比。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照研究。总共 190 名患者被随机分为 1:1:1 接受 AMC/DCBA+利多卡因、己基间苯二酚或安慰剂锭剂单次剂量。在给药后 2 小时内,获得了对喉咙疼痛、吞咽困难、喉咙肿胀、麻木和喉咙疼痛缓解的主观评分。还收集了患者和研究者的总体评分和消费者问卷。主要终点是给药后 2 小时内两种锭剂与安慰剂相比喉咙疼痛严重程度的变化。

结果

己基间苯二酚锭在主要和次要疗效变量方面优于安慰剂,包括与喉咙疼痛、喉咙疼痛缓解和吞咽困难相关的变量;AMC/DCBA+利多卡因锭在各个时间点的次要终点也优于安慰剂,但主要疗效变量未达到显著水平。两种锭剂在给药后 1-10 分钟(对于 AMC/DCBA+利多卡因锭)和 1-5 分钟(对于己基间苯二酚锭)就有快速的作用开始。在 AMC/DCBA+利多卡因锭中,从给药后 1 分钟开始出现麻木感,在 15 分钟时达到最大值。在己基间苯二酚锭中,从给药后 5 分钟开始出现麻木感,在 10 分钟时达到最大值。两种锭剂均耐受良好。

结论

AMC/DCBA+利多卡因和己基间苯二酚锭均能快速有效地缓解 URTI 患者的喉咙痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验